Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows remimazolam versus non-remimazolam anesthesia and delirium riskNew Anesthesia Drug Does Not Raise Delirium Risk After Surgery

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider remimazolam for general anesthesia but note increased PONV risk in this meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares remimazolam with non-remimazolam agents in surgical patients to assess delirium risk. The pooled analysis included 2734 patients in the remimazolam group and 2827 in the non-remimazolam group. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium, with secondary outcomes including postoperative nausea and vomiting, respiratory depression after extubation, extubation time, and length of hospital stay.

For the primary outcome, the relative risk of delirium was 0.81 with a 95% CI of 0.63–1.05 and a p-value of 0.11, indicating no significant difference between groups. However, a significant effect modification was observed in patients undergoing general anesthesia, where remimazolam was associated with a reduced risk (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60–1.00, p = 0.05). For postoperative delirium specifically, the relative risk was 0.93 (95% CI 0.76–1.15, p = 0.52), showing no significant difference.

Secondary outcomes revealed a statistically significant increase in postoperative nausea and vomiting with remimazolam (RR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.02–1.42, p = 0.03). No significant differences were found for respiratory depression after extubation (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.63–1.44, p = 0.84), extubation time (MD = -1.30, 95% CI -3.46-0.85, p = 0.24), or length of hospital stay (MD = 0.08, 95% CI -0.28-0.44, p = 0.65). The authors note that causality cannot be inferred from observational studies included in the meta-analysis and caution against overinterpreting non-significant findings.

Imagine waking up from surgery and feeling completely lost. You do not know where you are or what just happened. This frightening state is called delirium. It can happen after anesthesia. Many patients worry about this risk when they schedule a procedure. A new review looks at a modern anesthetic called remimazolam. It asks a simple question. Does this new drug make confusion more likely?

Delirium is a serious concern for patients and families. It can delay recovery and cause distress. Postoperative delirium happens in the hours or days after surgery. Emergence delirium happens right as you wake up. It is often more dramatic and upsetting in the moment. Older adults face higher risks, but children can experience it too. Current anesthesia options vary in how they affect this risk. Patients want safer choices that do not add confusion to an already stressful time.

Remimazolam is a newer benzodiazepine. It works fast and leaves the body quickly. Doctors like it because it offers predictable sedation. But some wondered if its rapid action might increase delirium. Past studies gave mixed signals. This review pulls together the best available data to settle the debate. It compares remimazolam to other anesthetic regimens.

Here is the twist. The overall delirium risk did not differ between groups. But a closer look revealed a pattern. The type of anesthesia mattered. In general anesthesia cases, remimazolam showed a possible protective effect. This finding suggests context is key. The drug may behave differently depending on how it is used.

Think of anesthesia like a dimmer switch for the brain. It turns down activity to allow surgery. Delirium is like a faulty light flickering on and off. The goal is a smooth, steady dimming. Remimazolam acts like a precise switch. It turns sedation on and off quickly. This control may help the brain return to normal faster. That could explain why it does not add to confusion risk.

The review analyzed 30 trials. These included randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, and one prospective cohort. Researchers searched major medical databases up to December 2025. They looked at over 5,500 patients combined. The main focus was delirium incidence. Secondary outcomes included nausea, breathing issues, and recovery time.

The numbers tell a clear story. Delirium occurred in 11.4 percent of remimazolam patients. It occurred in 15.2 percent of those receiving other anesthetics. The difference was not statistically significant. This means the drug did not clearly raise or lower risk overall. However, in general anesthesia cases, remimazolam was linked to a 23 percent lower risk. This finding was borderline significant. It suggests a potential benefit worth further study.

This does not mean remimazolam is a cure for delirium.

The review also looked at emergence delirium in children. Here, remimazolam showed a promising trend. The data suggested a lower risk, though the result was not definitive. This is important for parents and pediatricians. A calmer wake-up can make surgery less traumatic for kids. Other outcomes, like breathing problems or hospital stay length, showed no difference. One exception was nausea. Remimazolam was linked to a slightly higher risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Experts note that remimazolam is already approved for use in many countries. It is used for procedural sedation and induction. This review supports its safety profile regarding delirium. It also highlights the need for careful patient selection. The drug may be especially useful for patients at high risk of confusion. But doctors must weigh the small increase in nausea against the benefits.

For patients, this means more options. If you are scheduled for surgery, you can ask your anesthesiologist about remimazolam. It may be a suitable choice, especially for general anesthesia. It is not a guarantee against delirium, but it does not appear to increase the risk. Always discuss your full medical history and concerns with your care team.

The review has limitations. Most studies were small. The populations varied in age and surgery type. Delirium assessment methods differed across trials. These factors can introduce uncertainty. More large-scale studies are needed to confirm the pediatric benefits and the general anesthesia effect.

What happens next? Researchers will likely design targeted trials. They will focus on high-risk groups, such as older adults and children. Long-term data on repeated use may also be gathered. For now, remimazolam stands as a safe and effective option. It does not add to the delirium burden. It may even offer a calmer wake-up for some patients.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThe association between remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, and the risk of postoperative delirium (POD) and emergence delirium (ED) remains controversial, particularly following prolonged infusion.MethodsPUBMED, EMBASE, WEB OF SCIENCE and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched up to December 10, 2025. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium. Secondary outcomes included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), respiratory depression after extubation, extubation time and length of hospital stay. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to assess clinical and methodological sources of heterogeneity in intervention effect, including age, type of surgery, assessment methods of delirium, depth of anesthesia monitoring, the use of flumazenil as an antagonist for remimazolam.ResultsA total of 30 trials were included, consisting of 25 RCTs, 4 retrospective studies and a prospective cohort study. The incidence of delirium was 11.4% (312/2734) in the remimazolam group and 15.2% (429/2827) in the non-remimazolam group, showing no significant difference (RR = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63–1.05, p = 0.11) between groups. Subgroup analysis by anesthesia type, however, revealed a significant effect modification. In patients undergoing general anesthesia, remimazolam was associated with a 23% reduction in the risk of delirium (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.60–1.00, p = 0.05). When viewed in terms of this dichotomy, no significant difference was observed in 22 studies evaluating the incidence of POD between remimazolam group (13.1%, 295/2260) and non-remimazolam group (16%, 390/2431) (RR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76–1.15, p = 0.52), either in 8 studies on incidence of emergence delirium (RR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.13–1.37, p = 0.15). The pooled analysis using a fixed-effect model showed that remimazolam was associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of PONV compared to non-Remimazolam groups (RR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02–1.42; p = 0.03). Other secondary outcomes, respiratory depression after extubation (RR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63–1.44, p = 0.84), extubation time (MD = -1.30, 95% CI: −3.46-0.85, p = 0.24) and length of hospital stay (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: −0.28-0.44, p = 0.65) showed no significant difference between remimazolam group and non-remimazolam group.ConclusionIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, prolonged continuous intravenous administration of remimazolam throughout the surgical procedure does not increase the risk of delirium compared to other anesthetic regimens. In addition, remimazolam has potential benefits in the pediatric population as it reduces the risk of ED.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251138775, Identifier: CRD420251138775.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.