Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 Completed N=30 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Comparative Evaluation of Corneal Staining With Balafilcon A Lenses and Two Multi-Purpose Solutions

Myopia · Hyperopia · Astigmatism
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01024855 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2012
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Eyes With No Change in Corneal Staining — 16; 17; 19; 14 eyes

Summary

A new multi-purpose solution (MPS)was clinically evaluated against Opti-Free RepleniSH MPS at specific time points over the course of four days. The study was conducted with PureVision lenses.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Eyes With No Change in Corneal Staining
16; 17; 19; 14; 21; 21

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • were at least 18 years old;
  • were experienced contact lens wearers;
  • were correctable to at least 20/40 or better in both eyes with contact lenses;
  • were in good general health, with healthy eyes (other than requiring vision correction);
  • had not worn lenses for at least 12 hours before each baseline visit;
  • had a corneal staining score no greater than Grade 1 in either eye at time of enrollment;
  • had previously used an MPS or hydrogen peroxide solution successfully.

Exclusion Criteria

  • had a confirmed diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome or other condition that results in a chronic and/or pathologic dry eye condition;
  • required concurrent ocular medication or have used ocular medication within 24 hours of entering the study;
  • had a known sensitivity or intolerance to any MPS, study products or ingredient(s);
  • were currently participating in any other clinical study;
  • had a condition or are in a situation that, in the investigator's opinion, may put them at significant risk, confound the study results, or interfere significantly with their participation in the study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01024855). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search