N/A Completed N=92 Randomized Treatment

Differences in Morbidity Between a Necessity Endotracheal Suctioning Protocol Versus a Routine Endotracheal Suctioning

Hypoxemia · Arrhythmias · Cardiac Arrest · ventilator-associated pneumonia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01069185 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

1.1%

Results posted

Sep 2017

Primary outcomePrimary: Primary Composite End Point — 35; 48 event

Summary

Morbidity frequency associated to a endotracheal suctioning is different between a necessity endotracheal suctioning protocol versus a routine endotracheal protocol.

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Primary Composite End Point	35; 48	—
SECONDARY Mechanical Ventilation Length as Days.	2.5; 2.4	—

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Children older than 1 month until 14 years old requiring orotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

High frequency ventilation mode

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01069185). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.