Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=30 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Sleep Laboratory Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of the Rotigotine Skin Patch in Subjects With Restless Legs Syndrome and End-Stage Renal Disease Requiring Hemodialysis

Restless Legs Syndrome · End-Stage Renal Disease

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
13.3%
Results posted
Nov 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Ratio From Baseline to the End of the 2-week Maintenance Period in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI) — 1.16; 0.51 ratio — p=0.0232

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Rotigotine (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
Primary completion
Oct 2013

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Ratio From Baseline to the End of the 2-week Maintenance Period in Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)
1.16; 0.51 0.0232 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movements Index (PLMI) to the End of the Maintenance Period
10.3; -23.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Sum Score to the End of the Maintenance Period
-8.6; -15.9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 Score
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 1 to the End of the Maintenance Period
-1.1; -2.8
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 2 to the End of the Maintenance Period
-2.8; -4.4
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 3 to the End of the Maintenance Period
-3.2; -4.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 4 to the End of the Maintenance Period
-1.6; -2.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 5 to the End of the Maintenance Period
-1.6; -1.6
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-6 (RLS-6) Rating Scale 6 to the End of the Maintenance Period
-1.6; -3.4
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Periodic Limb Movement During Sleep Arousal Index (PLMSAI) to the End of the Maintenance Period
4.634; -1.609
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Sleep Efficiency to the End of the Maintenance Period
-2.850; 7.668
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Restless Legs-Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) Total Score to the End of the Maintenance Period
-10.2; -10.7
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Mental Component Summary (MCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period
6.4; 2.2
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 (SF-36) Item Questionnaire Physical Component Summary (PCS) to the End of the Maintenance Period
-0.3; 3.8

Summary

This is a sleep laboratory study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rotigotine in subjects with Restless Legs Syndrome and End-Stage Renal Disease requiring hemodialysis. The objectives are to demonstrate superiority of Rotigotine against Placebo as well as to investigate the effect of Rotigotine on quality of life and sleep.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis and regular dialysis schedule
  • Fulfillment of pre-defined criteria of hematology parameters
  • Diagnosis of Restless Legs (RLS) based on the 4 cardinal diagnostic clinical features according to the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group
  • Initial response to previous dopaminergic treatment for RLS, or has had no previous dopaminergic treatment (ie, de novo)
  • Score of ≥ 15 points on the IRLS (indicating moderate to severe RLS) at Baseline
  • Score of ≥ 11 points on the RLS-DI (Diagnostic Index) at Baseline
  • Score of ≥ 4 points on the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Item 1 assessment (indicating moderately ill) at Baseline
  • Scores ≥ 15 Periodic Limb Movements (PLMs) per hour on the Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI) based on Polysomnography (PSG) (recorded during the second night) as assessed by the investigator at Baseline

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinically relevant Polyneuropathy or Varicosis which cannot be clearly differentiated from RLS symptoms in the opinion of the investigator
  • Clinically relevant concomitant diseases, such as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Painful Legs, and Moving Toes
  • Other central nervous system diseases
  • Evidence of an impulse control disorder according to the modified Minnesota Impulsive Disorders Interview (mMIDI)
  • Lifetime history of suicide attempt (including an active attempt, interrupted attempt, or aborted attempt), or has suicidal ideation in the past 6 months as indicated by a positive response ('yes') to either Question 4 or Question 5 of the Columbia-Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Screening (Visit 1) or Baseline (Visit 2)
  • Prior history of psychotic episodes
  • History of symptomatic (not asymptomatic) Orthostatic Hypotension
  • Clinically relevant Cardiovascular Disease
  • Clinically relevant Venous or Arterial Peripheral Vascular Disease
  • Malignant Neoplastic Disease requiring therapy within 12 months prior to Screening (Visit 1)
  • Treatment with any of the following drug classes: neuroleptics, norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibitors (bupropion), gabapentin, budipine, dopamine antagonist antiemetics (except domperidone), opioids, monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors, or psychostimulants (eg, amphetamines)
  • Subject is pregnant, nursing, or is a woman of childbearing potential who is not surgically sterile, 2 years postmenopausal, or does not consistently use 2 combined effective methods of contraception (including at least 1 barrier method), unless sexually abstinent
  • Previous treatment with dopamine agonists within a period of 14 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2), or L-dopa within 7 days prior to Baseline (Visit 2)
  • Medical history indicating intolerability to dopaminergic therapy (if pretreated) or has experienced Augmentation (Garcia-Borreguero and Williams, 2010) when previously treated with any dopaminergic agent
  • Subject has received previous treatment with Rotigotine
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of the study medication, such as a history of significant Skin Hypersensitivity to adhesives, known Hypersensitivity to other transdermal medications, or unresolved Contact Dermatitis
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01537042). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search