Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=184 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of NT 201 Versus Placebo in Treating Chronic Troublesome Sialorrhea in Various Neurological Conditions

Chronic Troublesome Sialorrhea · Parkinson's Disease · Stroke · Traumatic Brain Injury
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02091739 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
184
Serious AEs
13.2%
Results posted
Feb 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: MP: Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow (uSFR) Rate at Week 4 — -0.04; -0.06; -0.13 gram per minute (g/min) — p== 0.004
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
121citations · ~17 / year
SIAXI: Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study of incobotulinumtoxinA for sialorrhea.
Neurology · 2019 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of two different dose levels of NT 201 (75 U or 100 U per cycle), compared with placebo, in reducing the salivary flow rate, and the severity and frequency of chronic troublesome sialorrhea that occurs as a result of various neurological conditions in adult subjects.

Linked Publications (2)

  • SIAXI: Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study of incobotulinumtoxinA for sialorrhea.
    Neurology · 2019 · 121 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Long-term incobotulinumtoxinA treatment for chronic sialorrhea: Efficacy and safety over 64 weeks.
    Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2020 · 45 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
MP: Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow (uSFR) Rate at Week 4
-0.04; -0.06; -0.13 = 0.004 sig
PRIMARY
MP: Participant's Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at Week 4
0.67; 1.02; 1.25 = 0.002 sig
SECONDARY
MP: Change From Baseline in Unstimulated Salivary Flow (uSFR) Rate at Week 8 and 12
-0.02; -0.08; -0.13; -0.03; -0.1; -0.12
SECONDARY
MP: Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS) at Week 1, 2, 8 and 12
0.67; 0.73; 0.96; 0.83; 0.91; 1.11

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Documented diagnosis of the basic neurological condition associated with sialorrhea (as above, (i), (ii) or (iii); with onset at least 6 months before screening).
  • Chronic troublesome sialorrhea related to parkinsonism or stroke or traumatic brain injury (for at least 3 months) at screening, defined as the presence of all of the following, at screening and at baseline and for at least the 3 months before screening (where retrospective response to questionnaires is impossible, a statement of equivalent severity will suffice):
  • A Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale [DSFS] sum score of at least 6 points and
  • A score of at least 2 points for each item of the DSFS and
  • A score of at least 3 points on the modified Radboud Oral Motor Inventory for Parkinson's Disease [mROMP], Section 'III Drooling', Item A).
  • A score of at most 2 points on the mROMP Section 'II Swallowing Symptoms' Item A) and a score of at most 3 points on Item C), at screening and at baseline.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Non-neurological secondary causes of sialorrhea.
  • Unstable concomitant medication influencing sialorrhea (such as anticholinergics for the treatment of parkinsonism; dosages of these medications must have been stable for at least 4 weeks before study entry, i.e. screening, and must be planned to remain stable during the course of the study.
  • Recent (i.e., four weeks) drug treatment for sialorrhea.
  • History of recurrent aspiration pneumonia.
  • Extremely poor dental/oral condition as assessed by a qualified dentist.
  • Recent (i.e., one year for sialorrhea, 14 weeks for other indications) treatment with - or known hypersensitivity to - Botulinum toxin, or known hypersensitivity to any ingredient of the study preparation.
  • Recent (i.e., four weeks) changes in anti-parkinsonian medication.
  • Previous or planned surgery or irradiation to control sialorrhea.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02091739) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search