N/A N=81 Randomized Triple-blind Other

Ecological Momentary Assessment and Text Message Intervention for Stress Management

Stress, Psychological · Loneliness · Covid19 · Stress

Bottom Line

View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04907942 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

0.0%

Results posted

May 2025

Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants Who Completed EMA and EMA Plus Text Message Intervention or EMA Intervention Alone. — 39; 42 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type: Interventional
Phase: N/A
Interventions: EMA + EMA and FACE Stress (Other); EMA Alone (Other)
Age: Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex: All
Sponsor: Click Therapeutics, Inc.
Primary completion: Dec 2020

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Number of Participants Who Completed EMA and EMA Plus Text Message Intervention or EMA Intervention Alone.	39; 42	—

Summary

Feasibility and acceptability of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) compared with an EMA plus automated text message intervention for stress management

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Age 22 years or older
Must reside in an Eastern Standard Time or Central Standard Time zone
Able to read and write in English as demonstrated by review and completion of an Informed Consent Form
Own an SMS enabled smartphone
Scoring >5 on the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale (reflecting higher-than-average perceived stress)

Exclusion Criteria

Reported cognitive impairment and/or psychiatric disorders of the psychotic spectrum
Enrolled in another support study
Currently receiving psychotherapy through telehealth
PHQ-9 score of 20 or greater.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04907942). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.