Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=60 Randomized Double-blind Health Services Research

Holding vs. Continuing Incretin-based Therapies Before Upper Endoscopy

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 · Obesity · Gastroparesis

Enrolled (actual)
60
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Dec 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Presence of RGV (Residual Gastric Volume) in Stomach — 7; 1 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
GLP-1 medication (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
The Cleveland Clinic
Primary completion
May 2025

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Presence of RGV (Residual Gastric Volume) in Stomach
7; 1
PRIMARY
Tracking the Use of Intubation Due to RGV
0; 0
PRIMARY
Aspiration Events Due to RGV (Residual Gastric Volume)
0; 0

Summary

To assess whether holding incretin-based therapy before endoscopy reduces the likelihood of clinically relevant Residual Gastric Volume (RGV). Primary Outcomes: * Residual gastric volume that precludes adequate endoscopic examination * Residual gastric volume that necessitates premature termination of the endoscopy procedure * Need for endotracheal intubation due to stomach contents. * Occurrence of aspiration events requiring extended observation/monitoring, unplanned therapeutics, and/or hospital admission Secondary Outcomes: * Presence of any solid food * Presence of moderate liquid content * Increased RGV(Residual Gastric Volume) defined as any amount of solid content or > 0.8 mL/Kg of fluid content (measured from the aspiration/suction canister). * Differences in primary and secondary outcomes between different medications

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients using incretin-based therapies at a stable dose for more than 1 month.
  • Patients scheduled for outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) under monitored anesthesia care.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Documented history of gastroparesis (based on a 4-hour solid-phase gastric emptying study)
  • Known history of achalasia
  • Surgical or genetically altered foregut anatomy
  • Known gastric outlet obstruction or pre-procedure imaging suggestive of gastric outlet obstruction.
  • Patients who did not follow the standard NPO (nil per oral) instructions.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06533527). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search