N/A N=180 Morphological Pattern of the Atrophic Posterior Maxillae
Bone Deficiency, Posterior Maxillae
Primary: Lateral Wall Thickness — 161 mm
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
N/A N=27 A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
Dental Alveolus · Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Primary: Gain in Horizontal Ridge Dimension — 3.33; 3.09 gain in ridge width (mm)
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm
N/A N=59 Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Alveolar Ridge Volumetric Changes — -8.36; -15.83 percentage of volume change
N/A N=66 Histological Evaluation of Healing Following Ridge Preservation Using a Combined Cortical/Cancellous Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 26.4; 24.5; 28.8 percentage of total area
Phase 2 N=24 Treatment of Alveolar Bone Defects Using Aastrom Biosciences Autologous Tissue Repair Cell Therapy
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Bone Regeneration — 79; 63 % bone height
N/A N=37 The Influence of Bone Allograft Particle Sizes on the Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets and Edentulous Ridges
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: New Bone Formation (in %) With the Use of Small vs. Large Particle Bone Allografts — 17.3; 25.9; 41.0; 31.4 % of new bone
N/A N=65 Study to Evaluate an Implant With a Sloped Top in Patients With a Sloped Jaw Bone
Edentulism
Primary: Bone Level Changes at the Lingual Aspect From Implant Placement (Baseline) to Re-entry 16 Weeks After Implant Placement — -0.02 mm
N/A N=40 Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Radiographic Bone Changes — -1.12; -2.60; -1.16; -.158 millimeter
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=9 Bioactive Glass (Sol-gel) for Alveolar Bone Regeneration After Surgical Extraction
Bone Loss · Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss · Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Change in Alveolar Crestal Bone Height — 0.32; 0.84; 1.59; 0.96 mm
N/A N=22 Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
Tooth Loss
Primary: Changes in Hard Tissue Composition — 35.82; 31.76 mm
N/A N=30 Marginal Bone and Soft Tissue Alterations After Use of OsseoSpeed EV Profile Implants
Alveolar Process Atrophy
Primary: Pink Esthetic Score (PES) at Temporary Crown Delivery. — 1; 1; 1; 1 score on a scale — p=0.0007
Phase 3 N=26 Changes of Soft and Hard Tissues After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs. L-PRF Clot
Alveolar Bone Loss · Tooth Loss
Primary: Overall Horizontal Change in Alveolar Ridge Width — -1.34; -2.21 Millimeters
N/A N=51 CopiOs® Pericardium Membrane for Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Defect
Primary: Change in Horizontal Ridge Widths From Baseline to 6 Months — 2.61 mm
N/A N=15 The Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Using Equine Xenograft and a Collagenated Porcine Cortical Lamina
Horizontal Ridge Deficiency
Primary: Change From Baseline in Radiological Bone Width Augmentation at 0 mm — 2.274 mm
Phase 3 N=39 CATER: Comprehensive Alveolar and Tooth Esthetic Replacement
Dental Implant Failure Nos
Primary: Percent Change in Volume of Alveolar Ridge as Measured by 3D Intraoral Scanning — 15.5; 16.8 percentage of volume change
N/A N=45 Assessment of Ridge Preservation Using Moldable Beta-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Grafting System
Dental Implants · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: Change in Radiographic Measurements of Ridge Dimension (Horizontal Ridge Width) — 1.26; 1.28 mm
Phase 4 N=20 Comparison of Two Different Surgical Approaches To Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness
Tooth Loss · Peri-implant Mucosa Defect
Primary: Change in Buccal Peri-implant Mucosa Thickness Between Baseline and 16 Weeks After Surgery — 0.44; 0.05 millimeters
N/A N=61 Periimplant Mucosa Dynamics Around Divergent and Concave Atlantis Abutment Transition Profiles
Dental Implant, Single-Tooth · Esthetics, Dental
Primary: Peri-Implant Mucosal Zenith Distance (in Millimeters) at the Concave/Divergent Abutment Sites — 9.860; 9.770; 9.684; 9.618 millimeters
N/A N=27 Implant Placement With Simultaneous Gum Grafting
Edentulous
Primary: Soft Tissue Thickness Over the Implant — 0.6; 0.4 mm
Phase 2 N=22 Bone Material Comparison in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
Alveolar Bone Resorption · Sequela · Tooth Extrusion
Primary: Bone Density - Limited View CBCT (Cone-beam Computed Tomography) Measurements — 14.4; 1.5 percentage of bone height shrinkage
N/A N=44 Histological Comparison of Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized FDBA Alone Versus a Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 24.7; 36.2 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=28 Effect of Mucograft® Seal on Post-extraction Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Primary: Changes in Alveolar Bone (mm) — -1.47; -1.21 mm
N/A N=5 Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering for Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
Cleft Lip and Palate
Primary: Amount of New Bone Mass Formed — 89 percentage of bone formation