N/A N=59 Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Alveolar Ridge Volumetric Changes — -8.36; -15.83 percentage of volume change
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm
N/A N=40 Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Radiographic Bone Changes — -1.12; -2.60; -1.16; -.158 millimeter
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=40 An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Ridge Buccal-Lingual and Apico-Coronal Measures at 6 Months — 4.95; 6.71; 5.29; 6.24 mm
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=28 Effect of Mucograft® Seal on Post-extraction Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Primary: Changes in Alveolar Bone (mm) — -1.47; -1.21 mm
N/A N=45 Assessment of Ridge Preservation Using Moldable Beta-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Grafting System
Dental Implants · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: Change in Radiographic Measurements of Ridge Dimension (Horizontal Ridge Width) — 1.26; 1.28 mm
N/A N=102 Wound Healing Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation Using DFDBA Alone in Particulate Fiber Form and in Combination With Xenograft
Dental Extraction · Wound Heal
Primary: Percentage Vital Bone Formation — 37.33; 40.76; 24.46; 23.85 percentage of vital bone formation
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Augmented With Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: Percentage of Vital Bone — 46; 39; 29; 40 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=66 Histological Evaluation of Healing Following Ridge Preservation Using a Combined Cortical/Cancellous Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 26.4; 24.5; 28.8 percentage of total area
N/A N=27 A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
Dental Alveolus · Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Primary: Gain in Horizontal Ridge Dimension — 3.33; 3.09 gain in ridge width (mm)
N/A N=8 Case Series of New Alloplastic Bone Graft Material
Periodontology · Oral Surgery
Primary: Percentage Change in Radiographic Measurement of Alveolar Ridge Height — 1.2 percentage of change
N/A N=38 Histologic Comparison of Healing After Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Two Different Xenografts
Partial Edentulism
Primary: New Bone Formation at Extraction/Xenograft Site Measured by Histological Evaluation at 16-20 Weeks — 29.38; 32.05; 14.02; 16.56 Percent
Phase 3 N=26 Changes of Soft and Hard Tissues After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs. L-PRF Clot
Alveolar Bone Loss · Tooth Loss
Primary: Overall Horizontal Change in Alveolar Ridge Width — -1.34; -2.21 Millimeters
N/A N=13 A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Flap Coverage in Extraction Sites: A Pilot Study
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Mean Difference in Alveolar Bone Height Change — 7.5; 8.1 mm
N/A N=44 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Porcine and Bovine Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 31.27; 36.21 % vital bone
N/A N=44 Histological Comparison of Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized FDBA Alone Versus a Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 24.7; 36.2 percentage of vital bone
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=54 Ridge Preservation Using a Ossix™ Bone vs Bio-Oss® Collagen
TEETH EXTRACTION
Primary: Percent Vital Bone Formation, — 26.8; 39.3 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=51 CopiOs® Pericardium Membrane for Localized Alveolar Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Defect
Primary: Change in Horizontal Ridge Widths From Baseline to 6 Months — 2.61 mm
N/A N=30 To Compare Ridge Preservation Technique Using Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) and Freeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) Layered Technique vs L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF Alone in Influencing Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Measurements of Clinical Dimensional Changes at Alveolar Ridge 3 Months After Ridge Preservation Procedure Using L-PRF Alone, L-PRF/FDBA, and L-PRF/FDBA Layered…
Phase 2 N=9 Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures
Alveolar Bone Loss · Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
Primary: Amount of Preservation of Alveolar Ridge Dimensions i.e..,Clinical Horizontal Ridge Width Change in Millimeter as Result of Ridge Preservation Procedures — 2.54; 2.72…
N/A N=24 A Volumetric Analysis of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing for Ridge Preservation and Socket Seal After Tooth Extraction
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Change in Buccal Plate Thickness From Baseline to Month 6 — 1.85; 1.25 mm — p=0.11
N/A N=22 Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
Tooth Loss
Primary: Changes in Hard Tissue Composition — 35.82; 31.76 mm
N/A N=21 Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Percent New Bone Formation — 41; 25; 26 percentage of new bone formation
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
Phase 4 N=32 Guided Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants
Missing Tooth
Primary: Change in Thickness of Buccal Bone — .73; .86; .63; .66 millimeters