N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=120 Impact of Treatment With ALVEOGYL in Patients With Post-extraction Dry Socket
Dry Socket
Primary: Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS : 0-10) — 106; 4 Participants
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=27 A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
Dental Alveolus · Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Primary: Gain in Horizontal Ridge Dimension — 3.33; 3.09 gain in ridge width (mm)
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=59 Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Alveolar Ridge Volumetric Changes — -8.36; -15.83 percentage of volume change
N/A N=22 Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
Tooth Loss
Primary: Changes in Hard Tissue Composition — 35.82; 31.76 mm
N/A N=37 The Influence of Bone Allograft Particle Sizes on the Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets and Edentulous Ridges
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: New Bone Formation (in %) With the Use of Small vs. Large Particle Bone Allografts — 17.3; 25.9; 41.0; 31.4 % of new bone
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=65 Study to Evaluate an Implant With a Sloped Top in Patients With a Sloped Jaw Bone
Edentulism
Primary: Bone Level Changes at the Lingual Aspect From Implant Placement (Baseline) to Re-entry 16 Weeks After Implant Placement — -0.02 mm
Phase 4 N=20 Comparison of Two Different Surgical Approaches To Increase Peri-Implant Mucosa Thickness
Tooth Loss · Peri-implant Mucosa Defect
Primary: Change in Buccal Peri-implant Mucosa Thickness Between Baseline and 16 Weeks After Surgery — 0.44; 0.05 millimeters
N/A N=9 Bioactive Glass (Sol-gel) for Alveolar Bone Regeneration After Surgical Extraction
Bone Loss · Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss · Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Change in Alveolar Crestal Bone Height — 0.32; 0.84; 1.59; 0.96 mm
N/A N=96 Study to Evaluate Bone and Gum Dimension Changes Around Dental Implants Placed in Different Positions in Bone.
Mouth, Edentulous
Primary: Change in Marginal Bone Level (MBL) — -0.14; -0.002; -0.20; -0.07 mm
N/A N=66 Histological Evaluation of Healing Following Ridge Preservation Using a Combined Cortical/Cancellous Mineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 26.4; 24.5; 28.8 percentage of total area
N/A N=20 Immediate Placement and Stabilization of Dental Implants With Tetranite Stabilization Material in Mandibular and Maxillary Tooth Extraction Sites That Fail to Provide Adequate Primary Stability
Adhesive Dental
Primary: Implant Success (Modified Buser Criteria) — 6 participants
N/A N=6 Customized Impressions in Dental Implants - Soft Tissues Changes
Soft Tissue
Primary: Changes in Soft Tissues Around Implant — 243.89 root mean square in µm
N/A N=47 Mandibular Overdenture Clinical Trial Comparing Parallel Sided and Tapered Dental Implants
Dental Implants
Primary: Difference in Implant Failure Rate Between Parallel Sided and Tapered Dental Implants at 5 Years — 1; 2 Participants — p=0.63
N/A N=5 Use of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering for Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
Cleft Lip and Palate
Primary: Amount of New Bone Mass Formed — 89 percentage of bone formation
Phase 3 N=39 CATER: Comprehensive Alveolar and Tooth Esthetic Replacement
Dental Implant Failure Nos
Primary: Percent Change in Volume of Alveolar Ridge as Measured by 3D Intraoral Scanning — 15.5; 16.8 percentage of volume change
N/A N=180 Morphological Pattern of the Atrophic Posterior Maxillae
Bone Deficiency, Posterior Maxillae
Primary: Lateral Wall Thickness — 161 mm
N/A N=28 Effect of Mucograft® Seal on Post-extraction Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Primary: Changes in Alveolar Bone (mm) — -1.47; -1.21 mm
Phase 3 N=26 Changes of Soft and Hard Tissues After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs. L-PRF Clot
Alveolar Bone Loss · Tooth Loss
Primary: Overall Horizontal Change in Alveolar Ridge Width — -1.34; -2.21 Millimeters
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=141 Study Comparing Appearance and Function of Three Different Dental Implant Designs When Placed in Front Region of Upper Jaw
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Primary: Buccal Soft Tissue (Gum) Changes, Measured as Mid-buccal Gingival Zenith (GZ) Scores. — 0.08; -0.10; 0.00 Millimeter
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm
Phase 3 N=44 Antibiotic Study for Dental Implants
Periodontitis
Primary: Overall PD Reduction — 1.25; 0.66 mm
N/A N=40 An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Ridge Buccal-Lingual and Apico-Coronal Measures at 6 Months — 4.95; 6.71; 5.29; 6.24 mm
Phase 2 N=24 Treatment of Alveolar Bone Defects Using Aastrom Biosciences Autologous Tissue Repair Cell Therapy
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Bone Regeneration — 79; 63 % bone height
N/A N=39 Healing Dynamics in Human Extraction Sockets Grafted With Bio-Oss Collagen®
Tooth Loss
Primary: Number of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 3 Years After Implant Placement — 3; 6; 7 participants