N/A N=120 Impact of Treatment With ALVEOGYL in Patients With Post-extraction Dry Socket
Dry Socket
Primary: Pain Using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS : 0-10) — 106; 4 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
N/A N=59 Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Alveolar Ridge Volumetric Changes — -8.36; -15.83 percentage of volume change
N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
N/A N=22 Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
Tooth Loss
Primary: Changes in Hard Tissue Composition — 35.82; 31.76 mm
N/A N=75 Investigation of the Effects of H-PRF on the Period After Impacted Third Molar Tooth Extraction
Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Primary: Postoperative Facial Swelling (Sum of 3 Linear Distances, mm) — 122.08; 118.55; 116.90; 119.68 Millimeters (mm)
N/A N=39 Healing Dynamics in Human Extraction Sockets Grafted With Bio-Oss Collagen®
Tooth Loss
Primary: Number of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 3 Years After Implant Placement — 3; 6; 7 participants
N/A N=44 Effect of Black Tea Extract Impregnated Gauze on Extracted Socket
Extracted Socket
Primary: Evaluation of the Effect of Black Tea Extract-Impregnated Gauze on Primary Bleeding Cessation After Molar Extraction — 17; 12; 4; 10 Participants
N/A N=13 A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Flap Coverage in Extraction Sites: A Pilot Study
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Mean Difference in Alveolar Bone Height Change — 7.5; 8.1 mm
N/A N=9 Bioactive Glass (Sol-gel) for Alveolar Bone Regeneration After Surgical Extraction
Bone Loss · Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss · Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Change in Alveolar Crestal Bone Height — 0.32; 0.84; 1.59; 0.96 mm
N/A N=102 Wound Healing Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation Using DFDBA Alone in Particulate Fiber Form and in Combination With Xenograft
Dental Extraction · Wound Heal
Primary: Percentage Vital Bone Formation — 37.33; 40.76; 24.46; 23.85 percentage of vital bone formation
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=24 A Volumetric Analysis of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing for Ridge Preservation and Socket Seal After Tooth Extraction
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Change in Buccal Plate Thickness From Baseline to Month 6 — 1.85; 1.25 mm — p=0.11
Phase 2 N=10 Evaluation of OSSIX-Plus Resorbable Collagen Membranes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Exodontia
Alveolar Bone Loss · Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction · Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Change in Bone Gain or Loss in Millimeters (Buccopalatal) — 7.7 mm
Phase 3 N=26 Changes of Soft and Hard Tissues After Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs. L-PRF Clot
Alveolar Bone Loss · Tooth Loss
Primary: Overall Horizontal Change in Alveolar Ridge Width — -1.34; -2.21 Millimeters
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=45 Assessment of Ridge Preservation Using Moldable Beta-tricalcium Phosphate Bone Grafting System
Dental Implants · Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Primary: Change in Radiographic Measurements of Ridge Dimension (Horizontal Ridge Width) — 1.26; 1.28 mm
N/A N=40 Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Radiographic Bone Changes — -1.12; -2.60; -1.16; -.158 millimeter
N/A N=30 To Compare Ridge Preservation Technique Using Leukocyte Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) and Freeze-dried Bone Allograft (FDBA) Layered Technique vs L-PRF/FDBA and L-PRF Alone in Influencing Quantity and Quality of New Bone Formation in Grafted Extraction Sockets
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Measurements of Clinical Dimensional Changes at Alveolar Ridge 3 Months After Ridge Preservation Procedure Using L-PRF Alone, L-PRF/FDBA, and L-PRF/FDBA Layered…
N/A N=44 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Porcine and Bovine Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 31.27; 36.21 % vital bone
N/A N=38 Histologic Comparison of Healing After Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Two Different Xenografts
Partial Edentulism
Primary: New Bone Formation at Extraction/Xenograft Site Measured by Histological Evaluation at 16-20 Weeks — 29.38; 32.05; 14.02; 16.56 Percent
Phase 4 N=32 Guided Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants
Missing Tooth
Primary: Change in Thickness of Buccal Bone — .73; .86; .63; .66 millimeters
N/A N=20 Immediate Placement and Stabilization of Dental Implants With Tetranite Stabilization Material in Mandibular and Maxillary Tooth Extraction Sites That Fail to Provide Adequate Primary Stability
Adhesive Dental
Primary: Implant Success (Modified Buser Criteria) — 6 participants
N/A N=171 Assessing a New Jaw Support Device During Third Molar Extractions
Impacted Third Molar Tooth · Temporomandibular Disorder
Primary: Occurrence of Pain at Follow-up With Wide Opening, or Pain in the Temple, Jaw Joint or Jaw Muscles. — 26; 32; 54; 53 Participants
Phase 3 N=166 Evaluation of EXPAREL for Prolonged Postsurgical Analgesia in Subjects Undergoing Third Molar Extraction
Dental Pain
Primary: Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Intensity Scores Through 48 Hours — 178.9; 181.6 units on NRS scale*hr — p=0.8661
Phase 4 N=90 Effect of St. John's Wort and Olive Oils on the Postoperative Complications
Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Primary: Postoperative Pain — 51.4; 56.3; 60.9 score on a scale
N/A N=21 Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Percent New Bone Formation — 41; 25; 26 percentage of new bone formation