N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=41 An Assessment of Bone Augmentation in Post-Extraction Sockets
Unrestorable Dentition · Post-Extraction Sockets
Primary: Bone-fill in Grafted Post-extraction Sockets Versus Bone-fill in Non-grafted Post-extraction Sockets — 0.43; 0.27; 0.36; 0.28 mm
N/A N=46 Effect of Healing Time on New Bone Formation Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation With Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft
Bone Augmentation
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 32.63; 47.41 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=40 Evaluation of Healing at Molar Extraction Sites With and Without Ridge Preservation
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Radiographic Bone Changes — -1.12; -2.60; -1.16; -.158 millimeter
Phase 4 N=17 Treatment of Post-Extraction Dehisced Socket - A Case Series Study
Tooth Loss
Primary: Bone Volumetric Reduction From Baseline to 20 Weeks Post-extraction — 73.26 mm3
N/A N=75 Investigation of the Effects of H-PRF on the Period After Impacted Third Molar Tooth Extraction
Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Primary: Postoperative Facial Swelling (Sum of 3 Linear Distances, mm) — 122.08; 118.55; 116.90; 119.68 Millimeters (mm)
Phase 4 N=32 Guided Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants
Missing Tooth
Primary: Change in Thickness of Buccal Bone — .73; .86; .63; .66 millimeters
N/A N=39 Healing Dynamics in Human Extraction Sockets Grafted With Bio-Oss Collagen®
Tooth Loss
Primary: Number of Participants That Had an Implant That Survived 3 Years After Implant Placement — 3; 6; 7 participants
N/A N=41 Case Selection and Treatment Protocol for Immediate Dental Implants in the Esthetic Zone
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially · Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
Primary: Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site — 0.36; 0.49 mm
N/A N=9 Bioactive Glass (Sol-gel) for Alveolar Bone Regeneration After Surgical Extraction
Bone Loss · Vertical Alveolar Bone Loss · Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Change in Alveolar Crestal Bone Height — 0.32; 0.84; 1.59; 0.96 mm
N/A N=13 A Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Flap Coverage in Extraction Sites: A Pilot Study
Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction
Primary: Mean Difference in Alveolar Bone Height Change — 7.5; 8.1 mm
N/A N=21 Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: Percent New Bone Formation — 41; 25; 26 percentage of new bone formation
N/A N=43 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Two Mineralized Cancellous Bone Allografts
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 27.19; 24.08 percentage
N/A N=102 Wound Healing Following Tooth Extraction and Ridge Preservation Using DFDBA Alone in Particulate Fiber Form and in Combination With Xenograft
Dental Extraction · Wound Heal
Primary: Percentage Vital Bone Formation — 37.33; 40.76; 24.46; 23.85 percentage of vital bone formation
N/A N=40 Ridge Preservation After Tooth Extraction Using Cortical Versus Cancellous Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Histologic Percentage of Vital Bone Formation — 12.98; 16.08 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=24 A Volumetric Analysis of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing for Ridge Preservation and Socket Seal After Tooth Extraction
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Change in Buccal Plate Thickness From Baseline to Month 6 — 1.85; 1.25 mm — p=0.11
N/A N=32 Risk Factors for Implant Bone Loss in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes
Primary: Radiographic Bone Level — 2.69; 2.54 mm
N/A N=59 Efficacy of Socket Grafting for Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Atrophy of Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Alveolar Ridge Volumetric Changes — -8.36; -15.83 percentage of volume change
N/A N=44 Histological Comparison of Ridge Preservation Using Mineralized FDBA Alone Versus a Combined Mineralized-Demineralized Freeze Dried Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction
Primary: Percent New Vital Bone Formation — 24.7; 36.2 percentage of vital bone
N/A N=38 Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially · Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
Primary: Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site — 0.54; 0.47 mm
N/A N=28 Effect of Mucograft® Seal on Post-extraction Ridge Preservation Using Bone Allograft
Tooth Extraction Status Nos
Primary: Changes in Alveolar Bone (mm) — -1.47; -1.21 mm
N/A N=32 Bone Remodeling After Immediate Implant Placement With and Without Bone Grafting
Tooth Loss
Primary: Mean Bucco-Lingual Change at 3mm — -0.84; -1.01 mm
N/A N=44 Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction Using Porcine and Bovine Xenograft Materials
Alveolar Bone Loss
Primary: % Vital Bone Formation (Histological) — 31.27; 36.21 % vital bone
N/A N=40 Esthetic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants Receiving Immediate Provisionalization and Delayed Restoration
Tooth Diseases · Tooth Extraction · Dental Implant
Primary: Mucosal Recession Change — 0.1; 0.1 milimeters
N/A N=44 Effect of Black Tea Extract Impregnated Gauze on Extracted Socket
Extracted Socket
Primary: Evaluation of the Effect of Black Tea Extract-Impregnated Gauze on Primary Bleeding Cessation After Molar Extraction — 17; 12; 4; 10 Participants
Phase 2 N=10 Evaluation of OSSIX-Plus Resorbable Collagen Membranes for Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Exodontia
Alveolar Bone Loss · Loss of Teeth Due to Extraction · Edentulous Alveolar Ridge
Primary: Change in Bone Gain or Loss in Millimeters (Buccopalatal) — 7.7 mm
N/A N=27 A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate Grafts
Dental Alveolus · Oral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
Primary: Gain in Horizontal Ridge Dimension — 3.33; 3.09 gain in ridge width (mm)
N/A N=38 Histologic Comparison of Healing After Tooth Extraction With Ridge Preservation Using Two Different Xenografts
Partial Edentulism
Primary: New Bone Formation at Extraction/Xenograft Site Measured by Histological Evaluation at 16-20 Weeks — 29.38; 32.05; 14.02; 16.56 Percent
N/A N=132 Study to Compare Survival for ASTRA TECH Implant System, OsseoSpeed™ Implants Following Immediate Loading in Extraction Sockets Versus Immediate Loading in Healed Ridges
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Primary: Implant Survival — 94.55; 98.28; 94.73 percentage of implants
N/A N=24 Ridge Preservation Comparing an Intrasocket Graft Alone to an Intrasocket Graft Plus a Facial Overlay Graft
Clinical Efficacy
Primary: Horizontal Ridge Dimension — -1.6; -0.3 mm