N/A N=20 Perioral Rejuvenation and Upper Lip Enhancement
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=29 JUVÉDERM VOLUMA® to Enhance the Appearance of the Asian Nose
Asian Nose Enhancement
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the Assessment of Aesthetic Improvement Scale (AAIS) as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician at Day…
N/A N=131 Restylane Perlane to Shape the Nasal Dorsum and/or Nasal Root
Nasal Augmentation
Primary: Mean Difference of Change in Volume (mL) at 6 Months After Baseline Versus Pre-treatment in the Nasal Dorsum/Nasal Root Between Restylane Perlane Treatment Group and…
N/A N=164 Safety and Effectiveness of JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine for Improvement of Volume and Aesthetic Appearance of the Nose in Chinese Adults
Nose Enhancement
Primary: Volume Change From Baseline in the Nose Area — -0.005; 2.032 cubic centimeters (cc) — p=<0.0001
N/A N=39 Quality of Life Impact of Nasal Airway Treatment With Aerin Medical Device
Nasal Obstruction
Primary: Change From Baseline NOSE Score — 53.3; 48.1; 53.5 units on a scale — p=<0.0001
N/A N=33 InFlux System for Nasal Breathing Improvement
Nasal Airway Obstruction
Primary: Incidence of Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects — 0 events
N/A N=50 Treatment of Nasal Airway Obstruction Using the Aerin Medical Device
Nasal Obstruction
Primary: Improvement in NOSE Score — 54.8 units on a scale — p=<0.0001
N/A N=20 Treatment Outcome Using Vivaer Stylus to Treat Nasal Airway Obstruction
Nasal Obstruction
Primary: Change in NOSE Score — -44.5 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=20 Injectable Filler for Cheek Flattening
Malar Deficiency
Primary: Blinded Evaluations of First Impression — 7.35 score on a scale
Phase 2 N=10 A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of ARTISS Human Fibrin Sealant as Used in External Rhinoplasty
Subjects Requesting and Requiring an Open Rhinoplasty
Primary: Edema Severity — 1.25; 1.5; 1.25; 1 units on a scale
N/A N=47 Nasal Septal Flap for Donor Site Reconstruction
Nasal Septum Perforation
Primary: Mean Change in Post-operative Remucosalization at the Donor Site — 47.8; 37.8; 49.7; 43.5 percentage of remucosalization
N/A N=113 Spirox Latera™ Implant Support of Lateral Nasal Wall Cartilage (LATERAL-OR) Study
Nasal Obstruction
Primary: The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Percent of Treatment Responders — 101 Participants
N/A N=60 Safety Study That Compares Perlane to Perlane With Lidocaine (Perlane-L) While Correcting Wrinkles in the Area Around Your Nose
Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Treatment Difference in VAS (Perlane Side - Perlane-L Side) With Difference in VAS >= 10 mm — 95 Participants
N/A N=36 A New Treatment for Mechanical Nasal Obstruction
Nasal Obstruction
Primary: Change in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF) — 28; 24; 13; 27 liters per minute
Phase 2 N=25 Safety and Efficacy of a Metallic Cannula Versus A Standard Needle for Soft Tissue Augmentation of the Nasolabial Folds
Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Participants With Haematoma — 10; 23; 6; 11 Participants — p=<0.0001
Phase 3 N=48 The Nasal Changes Affected by Different Alar Base Suture Techniques After Maxillary LeFort I Osteotomy
Conditions in T74.31 or T76.31
Primary: Soft and Hard Tissue Landmarks Movement — 0.95; -0.5; -0.95; -0.32 mm — p=0.098
N/A N=94 Barrow Nasal Inventory Survey
Pituitary Tumors
Primary: Change in Mean Survey Response From Baseline to 90 Days Post Surgery — 17.3; 13.5 units on a scale — p=0.001
Phase 3 N=18 Nasal Packing as a Drug Delivery System Postoperatively in Chronic Sinusitis With Polyposis
Chronic Sinusitis · Polyposis
Primary: Olfaction — 20.2; 19.8 units on a scale
N/A N=30 Evaluation of an Absorbable Implant for the Treatment of Nasal Valve Collapse
Nasal Valve Collapse
Primary: Implant-related Adverse Events — 5 participants
Phase 4 N=42 The Effectiveness of Nasal Corticosteroids Versus Placebo in Nasal Obstruction in Patients With Nasal Septal Deviation
Nasal Obstruction
Primary: Nasal Obstruction as Measured by Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) Scores Following Therapy With Treatment (Triamcinolone Acetonide) and Placebo (Ayr Saline…
N/A N=181 Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of Radiesse for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds in China
Correction of the Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Percentage of NLFs With Treatment Success at Month 6 — 66.0; 72.8 Percentage of successfully treated NFLs
N/A N=148 Restylane Defyne for Correction of Chin Retrusion
Chin Retrusion
Primary: Percentage of Participants (Responders) With At Least 1-Point Improvement From Baseline on the GCRS, as Assessed by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 6 ([Baseline…
Phase 4 N=101 Prospective Evaluation of Facial Cosmetic Procedures
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
N/A N=62 Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Fold, Hypoplastic
Primary: NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change — -1.50 score on a scale
N/A N=20 (Macrolane VR30) in Buttocks Reshaping and contouringCellulite (Macrolane VR30) in Buttocks Reshaping and Contouring
Cellulite of the Buttocks
Primary: Number of Patients With Aesthetic Improvement of the Buttocks Using Investigator GAIS — 7 Participants
Phase 4 N=37 Assessment and Augmentation of Lip Appearance in Specific Study Populations
Lip Aging · Lip Augmentation · Lip
Primary: Change in Lip Vessel's Thickness — 0.833; 0.360 µm
N/A N=273 New Dermal Filler for Lip Augmentation
Lip Augmentation
Primary: Assess Effectiveness of the Treatment Using the Medicis Lip Fullness Scale (MLFS) — 1.8; 1.7; 1.8; 1.8 Change in MLFS score from baseline
N/A N=30 Safety and Efficacy Study of Polydioxanone (PDS) Plates in Rhinoplasty
Rhinoplasty
Primary: Live Assessment of Satisfaction With the Grafts — 2; 4 units on a scale
N/A N=110 Saypha® Volume LIdocaine in Nasolabial Folds
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Responder Rate in Reduction of Nasolabial Folds — 34; 39; 73 Participants
N/A N=270 GAL1704 for Cheek Augmentation and Correction of Midface Contour Deficiencies
Cheek Augmentation
Primary: Assess Efficacy of Study Treatment Using Medicis Midface Volume Score (MMVS) — -1.4; -0.1; -1.3 score on a scale