N/A N=104 Vacuum-formed Retainer Versus Bonded Retainer to Prevent Relapse After Orthodontic Treatment
Orthodontics · Retention
Primary: Changes in Tooth Position — 0.05; 0.62 millimeters — p=0.0002
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=35 Comparison of Modified Vacuum-formed Retainers Versus Hawley Retainer
Orthodontic Retainers · Clinical Trial
Primary: Arch Width — 36.9; 37.65; 44.61; 46.31 milimeters
N/A N=84 Evaluation of Tailored Electronic Reminders on Compliance With Removable Orthodontic Retention
Retention · Compliance · Orthodontic
Primary: Wear of Removable Retainer Per Day (Hours) in the Intervention and the Control Groups — 3.09; 1.44 hours/day
N/A N=6 Temporary Anchorage Devices for Ridge Preservation
Ridge Preservation
Primary: Changes in Width of Extraction Site (Ridge) — 0.7; 1.3 mm — p=<0.05
N/A N=36 Characterizing Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Photographic Scans
Canine Retraction
Primary: Accuracy Between Patient-taken DM Scan and Provider-taken iTero Scan — 0.0001; 0.0500 Millimeters (mm)
N/A N=68 Comparison of Oral Hygiene & Root Resorption During Orthodontic Treatment
Orthodontic Pathological Resorption of External Root · Complication of Personal Oral Hygiene
Primary: Plaque Index — 0.5; 0.7; 0.7; 0.8 Plaque Index (PI)
N/A N=52 Evaluation of Clear Aligner Trays to Straighten Teeth
Malocclusion
Primary: Successful Correction of Malocclusion — 32; 20 Participants
N/A N=34 Clinical Performance of a New Esthetic, Self-ligating Orthodontic Bracket
Malocclusion
Primary: Bracket Door Stability — 0.8 percentage of bracket doors
N/A N=36 Analysis of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using 3D Imaging
Tooth Crowding · Dental Crowding · Malocclusion
Primary: Change in Little's Index From Baseline to 6 Weeks — -2.5; -2.9; -2.3; -2.6 mm
N/A N=14 Precision Orthodontics: A Comparison of Custom vs Traditional Bracket Treatment Efficiency
Dental Malocclusion
Primary: Length of Bonding Appointment — 33 minutes
N/A N=50 A Comparison of Stryker Hybrid Arch Bars
Fracture Mandible
Primary: Time to Place Archbars — 14.07; 37.29 minutes
N/A N=73 Effect of Clear Aligner Attachment Design on Extrusion of Maxillary Lateral Incisors
Maxillary Lateral Incisor Malocclusion
Primary: Percent of Vertical Tooth Movement — 79; 78; 78; 62 percentage of predicted
N/A N=13 BRIUS Vs FFA Efficiency
Dental Malocclusion · Angle Class II · Angle Class I
Primary: Overall 3D Movement — 1.46; 1.41 mm
N/A N=90 The Use of Clear Aligners With Movement Enhancement Techniques
Malocclusion
Primary: Tooth Movement Change — 0.363 millimeters
N/A N=20 OrthoPulse™ and Its Effect on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Alignment: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Malocclusion
Primary: Rate of Orthodontic Anterior Alignment in Millimetres Per Week (mm/wk) by Means of Little's Irregularity Index (LII) for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated…
N/A N=45 Assessment of the Efficacy of the Aerodentis System
Orthodontic Treatment · Tooth Crowding · Orthodontics
Primary: Litter's Index (Change in Little's Index Mean Total Score From Baseline) — 5.7; 6.2; 0.6; 0.3 mm
N/A N=38 Fluoride Varnish for Treatment of White Spot Lesions
White Spot Lesions
Primary: DIAGNOdent Readings at Baseline, Three and Six Months - Intergroup Comparison — 5.10; 6.01; 4.08; 5.50 units on a scale — p=0.636
N/A N=164 Class II Correction Study Using the Invisalign System
Malocclusion
Primary: Rate of Tooth Movement at the End of Class II Correction. — .44 mm/month
N/A N=53 Use of Two Dissolvable Therapeutics Under Removable Partial Dentures
Edentulous Jaw · Edentulous Mouth
Primary: Change From Baseline in Patient Comfort for as Assessed by Numerical Scale. — 0.99; 1.16 units on a scale
N/A N=86 Orthodontic Patient Experience of Intraoral Scans Versus Alginate Impressions
Orthodontic Patient Experience
Primary: Orthodontic Patient Comfort — 9.2; 7.7 score on a scale — p=0.0006
N/A N=29 Effect of Intra-Oral Photobiomodulation on Orthodontic Treatment Time
Malocclusion
Primary: Overall Orthodontic Treatment Time for OrthoPulse™ and Non-OrthoPulse™ Treated Patients. — 19.0; 21.2 months
N/A N=27 Accelerated Tooth Movement With AcceleDent® and Aligners - a Pilot Project
Tooth Movement · Malocclusion
Primary: Ability to Complete Treatment Aligners in Conjunction With an Active and Placebo Vibration Device (AcceleDent® Aura) — 10; 11 Participants
N/A N=33 The Effect of OrthoPulse™ on the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Malocclusion
Primary: Evaluation of Whether OrthoPulse Use Affects the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement During Full Mouth Fixed Orthodontic Treatment — 1.09; .39 millimeters per week
N/A N=40 Biomarkers of Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Fixed Appliances and Vibration Appliance Therapy
Tooth Movement
Primary: Changes in the Expression of Salivary Biomarkers of Bone Remodeling — -1.62; 0.5; -1.95; 0.47 pg/mL
N/A N=34 Accelerated Invisalign Therapy in Conjunction With Acceledent Aura
Malocclusion
Primary: Little's Irregularity Index (LI) at Baseline — 6.11; 6.31; 6.89 mm
N/A N=171 Assessing a New Jaw Support Device During Third Molar Extractions
Impacted Third Molar Tooth · Temporomandibular Disorder
Primary: Occurrence of Pain at Follow-up With Wide Opening, or Pain in the Temple, Jaw Joint or Jaw Muscles. — 26; 32; 54; 53 Participants
N/A N=21 Alveolar Microperforation for Inflammation-Enhanced Tooth Movement During Orthodontic Treatment
Malocclusion
Primary: Tooth Movement Between the Groups — 4.345; 4.04 percentage of movement
N/A N=47 Mandibular Overdenture Clinical Trial Comparing Parallel Sided and Tapered Dental Implants
Dental Implants
Primary: Difference in Implant Failure Rate Between Parallel Sided and Tapered Dental Implants at 5 Years — 1; 2 Participants — p=0.63
N/A N=49 The Effect of Ultrasound on Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Malocclusion
Primary: Rate of Tooth Movement — 0.266; 0.232 mm/week — p=0.0164
N/A N=78 Chesterfield Micro-implant Study Involving Three Types of Anchorage Methods in Orthodontics
Malocclusion · Class II Buccal Segment Relationship
Primary: Anchorage Loss Measured From 3-D Model Scanning — 0.80; 1.84; 1.36; 0.99 mm — p=0.05