N/A N=20 Perioral Rejuvenation and Upper Lip Enhancement
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=20 Assess the Impact of Lip Rejuvenation on Projected First Impressions and Mood Perceptions
Lip Rejuvenation
Primary: First Impressions — 46.756; 27.769; 46.391; 34.404 score on a scale
Phase 4 N=20 Study of Restylane and Perlane in the Correction of Peri-Oral Wrinkles
Peri-oral Wrinkles
Primary: Local and Systemic Adverse Events — 100 percentage of participants
Phase 4 N=18 Rejuvenation of the Lower Eyelid Using a Combination of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers - a Pilot Study
Infraorbital Hollows
Primary: The Primary Objective of This Study is to Determine the Efficacy and Longevity of the Use of Restylane® and Perlane® in Combination for the Rejuvenation of the…
Phase 4 N=58 Sequential Treatment With BELKYRA® Then Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine for Overall Improvement in Jawline Contour
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
N/A N=202 RHA Redensity - Perioral Rhytids
Perioral Rhytids · Aging · Wrinkle
Primary: Change From Baseline in Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Score Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment. — 121; 4; 29; 47…
N/A N=16 Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
N/A N=169 Restylane Perlane Lidocaine for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percent Responders With 1 Point Improvement on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale — 67; 8 Participants
N/A N=20 Efficacy of Periorbital Rejuvenation With a 1927 nm Diode Laser Treatment
Laser · Periorbital
Primary: Change From Baseline in Texture Score at Visit 4 (End-of-study Session) — 0.25; -4.75 score on a scale — p=0.075
N/A N=138 JUVEDERM® Ultra XC vs. Belotero Balance® for Perioral Lines
Patients With Moderate to Severe Perioral Lines
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Point Improvement From Baseline on the Perioral Lines Severity Scale (POLSS) — 87; 72 percentage of participants
N/A N=148 Restylane Defyne for Correction of Chin Retrusion
Chin Retrusion
Primary: Percentage of Participants (Responders) With At Least 1-Point Improvement From Baseline on the GCRS, as Assessed by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 6 ([Baseline…
N/A N=77 Global Management of Facial Rejuvenation With a New Range of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers
Facial Wrinkles
Primary: Full Face Global Aesthetic Improvement — 2.5 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=101 Prospective Evaluation of Facial Cosmetic Procedures
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
Phase 2 N=20 Combination Facial Aesthetic Treatment in Millennials
Dermatological Non-Disease
Primary: FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale — 42.35; 59.42 score on a scale
Phase 4 N=37 Assessment and Augmentation of Lip Appearance in Specific Study Populations
Lip Aging · Lip Augmentation · Lip
Primary: Change in Lip Vessel's Thickness — 0.833; 0.360 µm
N/A N=20 A Study to Examine the Effects of Cosmeceutical Therapy in Subjects Undergoing Full Facial Rejuvenation
Facial Rejuvenation With Neurotoxins and/or Hyaluronic Acid Fillers
Primary: C-GAIS by the PI or Designee — 1.22; 2.13; 1.75; 2.75 units on a scale
N/A N=30 RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent - Perioral Rhytids
Aging · Pain
Primary: Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into the Upper…
Phase 4 N=25 Changing in Skin Physiology After Microdroplet Placement of Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid in Aging Faces
Aging
Primary: Hydration Level — 53.19; 46.75 AU (arbitrary unit) — p=<0.05
N/A N=60 Pan Facial Volume Restoration
Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale
Phase 4 N=30 Emervel for the Correction of Lower Face Wrinkles & Folds
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
N/A N=225 A Safety and Effectiveness Study of JUVÉDERM VOLBELLA® XC Injectable Gel for Lip and Perioral Enhancement
Subjects Desiring Lip Augmentation
Primary: Change From Baseline in Evaluating Investigator's Assessment of Lip Fullness on a 5-Point Scale — 1.2; 1.1; 1.1; 1.0 Scores on a Scale
N/A N=140 Effectiveness and Safety of Restylane Lyft Lidocaine for Jawline Definition
Jawline Definition
Primary: Percentage of Responders Having At Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both Jawlines Concurrently Based on Galderma Jawline Scale (GJS) at Month 3 as Assessed…
N/A N=273 New Dermal Filler for Lip Augmentation
Lip Augmentation
Primary: Assess Effectiveness of the Treatment Using the Medicis Lip Fullness Scale (MLFS) — 1.8; 1.7; 1.8; 1.8 Change in MLFS score from baseline
N/A N=32 Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Following an Increased Density Treatment
Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin — 48 percentage of participants improved
N/A N=11 A Prospective Evaluation of Infraorbital Filler Injection
Dermal Filler · Rejuvenation
Primary: Volumetric Change in Infraorbital Treatment Baseline to Each Post-intervention Timepoint Day 14, Day 30, and Day 90 — -0.026; -0.065; -0.108 cc
N/A N=80 A Prospective, Open Label Study Evaluating JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA With Lidocaine Treatment for the Correction of Skin Depressions in the Infra-orbital Area
Infra-orbital Skin Depressions
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the Allergan Infra-Orbital Rating Scale (AIRS) on the Right and Left Side — 99…
N/A N=100 Efficacy and Safety of Restylane Perlane Compared to Restylane for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Population
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 6 Months — -0.03; 0.03 units on a scale
N/A N=168 Restylane Volyme for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Responders — 80; 87.2; 76.7 percentage of subjects
N/A N=15 Clinical Assessment of Skin Tightening and Contour Change of Submental Tissue Using Bipolar Radiofrequency Microneedling
Skin Laxity
Primary: Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area — -0.18; -017 percent change
N/A N=118 TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep and Perlane-L® for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds, Wrinkles
Primary: Non-inferiority of the Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe…