Clinical Trial Search

Primary: Change in Pain Intensity From Baseline (Pre-Operative) to Immediately During the Procedure (Day 0), Measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 5.05; 0.64 score on a…

Primary: Success Rate Based on Pulp Vitality Tests (Vital/Non Vital) — 96.2; 100; 100; 86 Percentage of success rate — p=>0.1

Primary: Clinical Success at 6 Months — 27; 30 Participants

Primary: Gingival Index (GI) — 1.04; 1.01 units on a scale — p=<0.05

Primary: VAS Scores as Measures of Profoundness of Pulpal Anesthesia — 3.1; 1.2 Score on a scale

Primary: Parameters Evaluated After Treatment — 19; 19; 25; 3 Participants

Primary: Hypersensitivity Tactile(Yeaple Probe) — 19.81; 13.94 units on a scale — p=0.05

Primary: Number of Participants With Successful Injection Technique Assessed by Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) — 16; 37; 29; 26 Participants

Primary: Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale — 0; .33 score on a scale

Primary: Clinical Examination — 30; 30 Participants

Primary: Subjective Tooth Assessment: Number of Teeth With Normal and Abnormal Pulp — 111; 32 Teeth

Primary: Tooth Hypersensitity to Touch Stimuli (Tactile) — 10.83; 10.63 Units on a scale — p=0.05

Primary: Adjusted Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Sensitivity Pain Response of Hypersensitive Tooth on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Immediately Post Application of 5%…

Primary: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 4.06; 2.68; 2.41; 2.27 score on a scale

Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Week 8 — -0.9; -0.5 Score on a scale — p=<0.0001

Primary: Clinical Outcome Based on Success After Intervention on MIH Affected Molar at 6 Months — 17; 18; 17 number of Successful MIH affected molars

Primary: Post-operative Pain on the Visual Anlogue Scale (VAS) at the 6-hour Post-operative Interval — 5; 3.2; 3.5 units on a scale

Primary: 24 Hour Postoperative Pain for Patients Seen From 09/2020-06/2021 — 14.75; 16.23 score on a scale — p=0.63

Primary: Vitality of Teeth (Units) Using Thermal and Percussion Sensitivity Trend Observed During Study Duration (3-11 Months) — .559; .592; .065; .040 Teeth

Primary: Change From Baseline Air Challenge — -0.412; -0.132 Units on a scale

Primary: Pain Intensity Measure: Visual Analogue Pain Scale — 11.8; 8.8; 9.4; 10.3 score on a scale — p=0.329

Primary: Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score on Day 14 — 2.51; 2.51; 1.16; 1.35 score on a scale — p=0.1774

Primary: Change From Baseline in Evaporative Air Sensitivity Pain Response on a Schiff Sensitivity Scale at Day 14 — -1.20; -0.37 Score on a scale — p=<0.0001

Primary: Change From Baseline in Mean Occlusion Scores After 8 Days Treatment Application — 4.38; 4.32; 4.36; 3.43 Score on a scale — p=0.5512

Primary: Number of Participants With Post-operative Sensitivity Having VAS Score >3 — 14; 12; 6; 16 Participants — p=0.05

Primary: Caries Activity and Progression Assessment Using LASER Fluorescence Readings by Diagnodent® Device. — 18.6; 1.1 units on a scale

Primary: Percent Reduction in Apical Radio-lucency — 17.4; 27.1 % Change in Diameter (mm)

Primary: Visual Analogic Scale (0-100) for Tooth Sensibility. — 6.31; 11.14 units on a scale

Primary: Mean Schiff Sensitivity Score (Average of the Two Selected Test Teeth) at Baseline (Day 0) — 2.61; 2.60 Score on a scale

Primary: Number of Participants With Treatment Failure — 2; 2 participants