Clinical Trial Search

Primary: Spontaneous Pain as Measured by Visual Analog Scale at Baseline and at End of 6 Weeks. — 42.9; 51.4; 30.4; 44 units on a scale

Primary: Characteristic Pain Intensity (Characteristic Intensity of Facial Pain) — 3.1; 2.9; 3.6 units on a scale — p=0.19

Primary: Patient-Rated TMD Pain, an 11 Point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) — 0.9; 1.4; 1.6; 0.7 units on a scale

Primary: Characteristic Facial Pain Score — 6.52; 6.55; 5.11; 5.47 units on a scale — p=0.020

Primary: Number of Participants With Pain Relief as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Decrease of 50% or Greater From Baseline — 4; 9 participants

Primary: Pain Intensity (German Pain Questionnaire; Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD)) — 5.40; 5.53; 3.90; 3.89 units on a scale

Primary: Assessing Graded Chronic Pain Severity Evaluation Feasibility of the PACT Program — -12; -19 units on a scale

Primary: Change From Baseline In Craniomandibular Index (CMI) Scores At 3 Months (In A Scale) — .23; .20 Units on a scale — p=<0.0096

Primary: Pain Evaluation — 6.38; 6.93; 5.76; 5.49 score on a scale

Primary: Average Pain — 4.7; 4.4; 4.5; 5.0 units on a scale — p=<.05

Primary: Visual Analogic Scale for Pain Intensity (0-10) — 6.52; 4.8; .81; 2.05 units on a scale

Primary: Changes of Perceived Pain Between Three Time Points (Baseline, Post-treatment, and 3 Months Later) and Between Groups (Sham Simulation and Pressure Release Technique)…

Primary: Self Report of Pain — -.86; -2.0; -1.4; -1.3 Scores on pain intensity scale — p=0.17

Primary: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity at 20 Weeks — 1.72; 1.42 score on a scale — p=0.567

Primary: Change From Baseline in Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) for Pain — 4.1; 4.4; 5.2; 3.3 millimeters — p=<0.001

Primary: Occurrence of Pain at Follow-up With Wide Opening, or Pain in the Temple, Jaw Joint or Jaw Muscles. — 26; 32; 54; 53 Participants

Primary: Change in Pain Between Baseline and Month 1 Scores — -1.1; -1.7; -2.6; -2.0 units on a scale

Primary: Change in the Weekly Mean Pain Index After 9 Weeks of Treatment — -13.9; -12.1 units on a scale — p=0.414

Primary: Change From Pre-Treatment in TMJ Loading Pain Rating at 12 Weeks — -1; -2 units on a scale

Primary: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 5.4 score on a scale

Primary: Maximum Interincisal Opening (MIO) Measurements — 23.1; 27.9; 33.8; 35.6 Millimeter

Primary: The Efficacy in the Treatment of TMJ and Muscle Pain — 21.93; 40.81 units on a scale

Primary: The Visual Analog Scale for Pain Was Used to Grade Discomfort in Chewing After the Installation of Facial Paralysis. Level Zero is the Lack of Discomfort and 10 is the…

Primary: Change in Jaw Pain as Reported by Patient on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) — 58; 54; -19; -14 score on a scale — p=0.80

Primary: Treatment Feasibility — 18 Participants — p=.05

Primary: Adverse Response to rTMS — 0; 0 Participants

Primary: Pain Score — 4.9; 4.4 units on a scale

Primary: Latency Between mLVP and mTVP Signals — 127.26 Time in milliseconds

Primary: Number of Participants Demonstrating Improved MIO Using Either the Dynapslint System or Tongue Depressors — 12; 12; 7; 7 participants

Primary: Eustachian Tube Dysfunction (ETD) Symptom Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Total Score — 59.6 score on a scale