30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Volume Restoration and Shaping of the Buttocks
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Improvement on the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GEIS) at Month 6 — 80.4 percentage of participants
Cellulite of the Buttocks
Primary: Number of Patients With Aesthetic Improvement of the Buttocks Using Investigator GAIS — 7 Participants
Buttocks Volume Loss
Primary: Change From Baseline in Buttocks Volume 6 Months After Treatment — 22.21 cm^3 — p=<0.0001
Atrophy
Primary: Change From 6 Months to Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain After 15 Minutes of Sitting — -28.1 mm
Asian Nose Enhancement
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Grade Improvement on the Assessment of Aesthetic Improvement Scale (AAIS) as Assessed by the Central Evaluating Physician at Day…
Age-related Volume Deficit in the Mid-face
Primary: Subject Experience Measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire — 1.94; 1.62; 1.51 Units on a scale
Age-related Volume Deficit in the Mid-face
Primary: Change From Baseline in Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) Score — 3.5; 3.5; -1.8; -1.9 score on a scale
Breast Enhancement
Primary: Number of Breasts With Successful Placement of the Implant Posterior to the Mammary Gland at 6 Weeks After Treatment — 48 Breasts
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
Mid-facial Volume Deficit Related to Aging
Primary: Responder Rate Based on Improvement in Score on Validated 6-point Mid-Face Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) — 85.6; 38.9 percentage of responders
Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale
Temple Hollowing
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events — 23; 59; 1; 2 Participants
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Responders — 80; 87.2; 76.7 percentage of subjects
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
Chin Retrusion
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1-point Improvement (Decrease) on the Allergan Chin Retrusion Scale (ACSR) Score — 56.3; 27.5 percentage of participants — p=0.0019
Contour Irregularity of Reconstructed Breast
Primary: Breast Projection — 19.8205 percentage loss of projection
Nose Enhancement
Primary: Volume Change From Baseline in the Nose Area — -0.005; 2.032 cubic centimeters (cc) — p=<0.0001
Mid-face Volume Deficiency
Primary: Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in the Subject's Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Week 4 — 97.06 percentage of…
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Participants With 1 Point Improvement From Baseline on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) as Measured by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 12 — 68.8…
Circumference Reduction
Primary: Circumference Change in the Thighs at the 12-week Follow-up Compared to Baseline Measurements — -2.8 centimeter
Malar Deficiency
Primary: Blinded Evaluations of First Impression — 7.35 score on a scale
HIV Facial Lipoatrophy
Primary: Number of Participants Rated Very Much Improved on the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) by Prinicple Investigator — 19 participants
Jawline Definition
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Show ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement on Both Sides From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS) — 38.0; 69.0…
Breast Augmentation
Primary: Investigator Overall Satisfaction With the Device Using a 5-Point Scale — 4.6 score on a scale
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Responder Rate in Reduction of Nasolabial Folds — 34; 39; 73 Participants
Nasal Augmentation
Primary: Mean Difference of Change in Volume (mL) at 6 Months After Baseline Versus Pre-treatment in the Nasal Dorsum/Nasal Root Between Restylane Perlane Treatment Group and…
Lip Volume Enhancement
Primary: Month 3 Overall Lip Fullness Scale Responder Rate Based on Independent Central Reviewer's Assessment — 34.1; 29.3 Percentage of subjects
Facial Injuries
Primary: Soft Tissue Volume After Autologous Fat Grafting Using CT Scans. — 11.4; 7.4; 6.5 milliliters
Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury)
Primary: Change in Limb Volume — 8; 2 Participants
Edematous Fibrosclerotic Panniculopathy (Cellulite)
Primary: 2-level Composite Responders for the Target Buttock — 12; 1; 202; 205 Participants — p=0.002