Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Standard-of-care salvage radiotherapy aims to improve metastasis-free proportion in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancerNew trial plans to test radiation for prostate cancer recurrence

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that this is a trial protocol; results are based on power calculations and not actual clinical outcomes.

This randomized controlled trial protocol is designed to evaluate the clinical benefit of immediate standard-of-care salvage radiotherapy (SRT) compared to initial observation for men with biochemical recurrence. The study population includes 312 men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 0.2 to 1.5 ng/mL following radical prostatectomy, with no radiographic evidence of recurrence on mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT.

The primary outcome is 5-year distant recurrence-free survival using a 12-month landmark. Power calculations for the study indicate a metastasis-free proportion of 89.8% in the experimental group versus 80.7% in the control group, with a hazard ratio of 0.5. Secondary outcomes include time to hormone therapy, quality of life measures, adverse effects, and novel biomarkers.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A noted limitation is that retrospective data comparing SRT to observation for these patients is fraught with selection bias. Because this is a protocol, the results are based on power calculations and historical analysis rather than actual trial outcomes. The study aims to clarify the benefit of immediate SRT in patients with mpMRI and PET-negative biochemical recurrence.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This protocol addresses a gap in managing biochemical failure of prostate cancer. It specifically targets patients with no radiographic evidence of recurrence, a population where PSMA PET-guided management has been shown to lead to a 53% management change in men with biochemical failure.

When prostate cancer returns after surgery, it can be hard to know the best next step. Sometimes, blood tests show the cancer is coming back, but scans like MRI or PET scans cannot see where it is. This creates a difficult choice for patients: should they wait and watch, or start treatment immediately?

A new trial is being designed to help clarify this choice. The study will look at 312 men who had surgery and then showed a rise in a specific protein in their blood. Researchers want to see if giving these men immediate radiation therapy works better than waiting until a scan shows a problem before starting treatment.

It is important to note that the current data comes from a study plan and historical records, not from the actual results of the new trial. Because the current data relies on past records, it may have some bias. The goal is to eventually provide clearer guidance for men facing this specific, uncertain situation.

What this means for you:
A new trial aims to see if early radiation helps men whose prostate cancer returns but is invisible on scans.

Common questions

Who is this study for?

This study is for men who had surgery to remove their prostate and then showed a rise in a specific blood protein. These men must have no visible signs of cancer on their MRI or PET scans. The study aims to help these men decide between immediate radiation or waiting until a scan shows a problem.

What is the goal of the radiation treatment?

The goal is to see if immediate radiation therapy helps men stay free from distant cancer spread for at least five years. The study uses historical data to estimate that radiation might improve the chance of staying cancer-free compared to waiting and watching.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 312
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up60.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The optimal management of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial, particularly in the absence of clinical or radiographic evidence of disease. Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) remains standard of care, but it is unclear whether SRT benefits patients when modern imaging with a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) are negative for local recurrence. Retrospective data comparing SRT to observation for such patients is fraught with selection bias, underscoring the need for a prospective randomised controlled trial. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Biochemical Recurrence Irradiation or Observation (BRIO) is a randomised study under the DIVINE trial framework (NCT06378866) enrolling men with BCR (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level ≥0.2, up to 1.5 ng/mL) after RP with no radiographic evidence of recurrence on mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT. Major inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after RP with a PSA level between 0.2 and 1.5 ng/mL, and no local or metastatic recurrence on imaging. A total of 312 patients will be enrolled. Participants are randomised 1:1 to standard-of-care SRT followed by surveillance (Group A), or initial observation with subsequent image-guided therapy at radiographic progression (Group B). Based on historical analysis, a total of 30 metastasis events provides 80% power to detect a significant improvement (hazard ratio 0.5 corresponding to a 5-year metastasis-free proportion of 80.7% in the control group and 89.8% in the experimental group with one-sided type I error rate of 0.15). All participants undergo baseline blood collection to measure prostate cancer-extracellular vesicles and cell-free DNA for biomarker development. Participants are followed in a 16-week cycle with serial PSA measurements, repeat imaging if PSA doubles, safety assessment, and patient-reported outcomes. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is distant recurrence-free survival at 5-years using a 12-month landmark to mitigate bias arising from differing assessment schedules for patients receiving optional 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy. Key secondary outcomes include time to hormone therapy, quality of life measures, adverse effects, and novel blood and urine biomarkers. CONCLUSION: The BRIO study will clarify the clinical benefit of immediate SRT vs observation with image-guided intervention in mpMRI and PET-negative BCR after RP.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.