Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Erector Spinae Plane Block provides superior pain relief compared to Intercostal Nerve BlockErector Spinae Plane Block Provides Better Pain Relief for Thoracic Surgery

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that ESPB provides superior pain relief compared to ICNB, but does not significantly reduce opioid consumption.

This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) against the Intercostal Nerve Block (ICNB) for patients undergoing thoracic surgery or experiencing chest wall trauma. The primary outcome of analgesic efficacy was assessed through pain scores at multiple intervals.

The analysis indicates that the ESPB group achieved significantly lower pain scores at 1 hour (P < 0.00001), 24 hours (P < 0.00001), and 48 hours (P = 0.0008) compared to the ICNB group. However, secondary outcomes including opioid consumption at 24 hours (P = 0.10) and 48 hours (P = 0.20) showed no significant differences between the two techniques. Additionally, no significant differences were observed in hospital stay duration (P = 0.06) or the time spent under analgesia (P = 0.33).

Clinical implications suggest that while ESPB provides superior immediate and sustained pain relief compared to ICNB, it does not appear to result in a statistically significant reduction in opioid consumption or length of stay. The study did not report specific limitations or safety data. Clinicians may consider ESPB for superior pain management in thoracic cases, noting that it does not currently show a measurable impact on opioid requirements or hospital duration compared to ICB.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis confirms that ESPB provides superior pain relief compared to ICNB for thoracic surgery and chest wall trauma. This finding extends the clinical utility of ESPB, which was previously shown to provide comparable analgesic efficacy to paravertebral plane block in breast cancer surgery. While other techniques like the quadratus lumborum block and external oblique intercostal block have shown specific opioid-sparing effects in different surgical contexts, this finding specifically highlights the superior pain scores associated with ESPB in thoracic cases.

Researchers compared two different types of nerve blocks for patients undergoing thoracic surgery or suffering from chest wall trauma. The two methods compared were the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and the Intercostal Nerve Block (ICNB). The goal was to see which method provided better pain relief and affected other factors like medication use and hospital stay.

The results showed that the ESPB group had significantly lower pain scores at one, 24, and 48 hours after the procedure. While the ESPB provided better immediate and ongoing pain relief, it did not result in a significant difference in the amount of opioids used by patients at 24 or 48 hours. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the length of hospital stays or the total time patients spent under pain relief.

Because this was a meta-analysis, the findings provide a broad look at the data, but individual results can vary. While the ESPB is shown to be more effective at lowering pain scores, it does not currently change the amount of extra medication needed or the time spent in the hospital. Patients should talk to their doctors about which nerve block is best for their specific surgery.

What this means for you:
The ESPB nerve block provides better pain relief than the ICNB for thoracic surgery patients.

Common questions

Is the ESPB more effective than the ICNB for pain?

Yes, the study found that patients receiving the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) had significantly lower pain scores at 1 hour, 24 hours, and 48 hours compared to those receiving the Intercostal Nerve Block (ICNB).

Does the ESPB block reduce the amount of opioids needed?

The study found no significant difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours (P = 0.10) or 48 hours (P = 0.20) between the two types of nerve blocks.

Does the type of nerve block affect how long a patient stays in the hospital?

The study found no significant difference in hospital stay duration between the ESPB and ICNB groups (P = 0.06). Patients should consult their doctors regarding specific recovery plans.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgeries and chest wall traumas often result in severe postoperative pain, leading to significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. Intercostal nerve blocks have been a common strategy for managing this pain. In this regard, the ESPB is being utilized increasingly as a promising alternative as it offers more extensive pain relief and has a better safety profile. OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis comparing analgesic efficacy, measured by pain scores and opioid consumption, as well as hospital length of stay and time spent under analgesia, between ESPB and ICNB in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries and chest wall trauma was performed. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across three databases, identifying 2,141 potential studies. After eliminating duplicates (n = 728), the remaining studies were screened in two stages: initially by reviewing abstracts and titles (n = 1,413), followed by a full-text review of the remaining studies (n = 10). These selected studies assessed postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Pain was measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h postoperatively, while opioid consumption was quantified in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 and 48 h. RESULTS: The ESPB demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at 1 h (P < 0.00001), 24 h (P < 0.00001), and 48 h (P = 0.0008) postoperatively compared to the ICNB. Postoperative opioid consumption, measured in intravenous morphine milligram equivalents at 24 h (P = 0.10) and 48 h (P = 0.20) showed no significant difference between the two groups. Additionally, there were no significant differences observed in hospital stay duration (P = 0.06) or time spent under analgesia (P = 0.33). CONCLUSION: While ESPB provides superior pain relief at all measured time points postoperatively, there were no significant differences in postoperative opioid consumption, hospital stay, or time under analgesia between ESPB and ICNB. Both techniques effectively manage thoracic pain, but ESPB offers enhanced analgesic effects. Further research is necessary to refine these techniques and establish clearer guidelines for their use in specific clinical contexts.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.