Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Lung ultrasound-guided decongestion reduces HF hospitalization and mortality risk in heart failure patients compared to standard care

Lung ultrasound-guided decongestion reduces HF hospitalization and mortality risk in heart failure…
Photo by Europeana / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider lung ultrasound-guided decongestion to reduce HF hospitalization and mortality risk in heart failure patients.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of lung ultrasound-guided decongestion compared to standard of care in a population of 1095 heart failure patients. The primary outcomes included HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes assessed HF urgent visits and specific adverse events.

The analysis demonstrated a significantly decreased risk for the composite of HF hospitalization and all-cause mortality with a relative risk of 0.72 and a 95% CI of 0.56, 0.93. Specifically, HF hospitalization risk decreased with an RR of 0.65 (95% CI 0.48, 0.88), and HF urgent visits decreased with an RR of 0.38 (95% CI 0.22, 0.66). All primary and secondary efficacy outcomes showed p-values indicating statistical significance.

Regarding safety, there was no significant difference in hypotension (RR 1.87, 95% CI 0.56, 6.20), hypokalemia (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.48, 1.82), hyperkalemia (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62, 1.53), or acute kidney injury (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.66, 1.77). The authors noted a tolerable safety profile, though serious adverse events and discontinuations were not reported. Funding or conflicts were not reported.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 1,095
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary congestion is a prognostic marker for heart failure (HF) morbidity and mortality; however, the current congestion evaluation depends on traditional physical examination, which lacks adequate sensitivity. Lung ultrasound (LUS) has been investigated as a more sensitive method to guide decongestion in decompensated HF. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) obtained from PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science until March 2025. Using Stata MP v. 17, we used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using the risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using the standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42024620337. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 1095 patients were included. LUS-guided management significantly decreased the risk of HF hospitalization/all-cause mortality (RR: 0.72, [95% CI 0.56, 0.93], p = 0.01), HF hospitalization (RR: 0.65, [95% CI 0.48, 0.88], p = 0.01), and HF urgent visits (RR: 0.38, [95% CI 0.22, 0.66], p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between LUS-guided management and standard of care regarding the incidence of hypotension (RR: 1.87, [95% CI 0.56, 6.20], p = 0.31), hypokalemia (RR: 0.93, [95% CI 0.48, 1.82], p = 0.83), hyperkalemia (RR: 0.98, [95% CI 0.62, 1.53], p = 0.91), and acute kidney injury/impaired renal function (RR: 1.08, [95% CI 0.66, 1.77], p = 0.75). CONCLUSION: LUS-guided decongestion was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of HF re-hospitalization and HF urgent visits, with a tolerable safety profile, compared to standard care, with similar rates of hypotension, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, and AKI.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.