Microcirculatory dysfunction during cardiac surgery remains heterogeneous and inconclusive in current clinical evidence
This narrative review addresses microcirculatory dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The scope includes secondary outcomes such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, and organ dysfunction. The authors highlight that clinical evidence remains heterogeneous and inconclusive across these domains.
The review notes that clinical use remains limited by technical challenges and a lack of standardized endpoints. Frequently, the evidence relies on indirect evidence of organ dysfunction rather than direct measures of microvascular perfusion. Important gaps remain in translating findings from experimental models to patients, which affects the certainty of conclusions drawn from preclinical studies that often support biologic plausibility but lack clinical confirmation.
The authors suggest that greater integration of bedside imaging and biomarkers with biophysiological principles may help establish microcirculation as both a mechanistic endpoint and a therapeutic target in cardiac surgery. However, the review does not report specific adverse events, sample sizes, or pooled effect sizes for interventions like volatile anesthetics or statins. The overall certainty is low due to the heterogeneous nature of the available clinical data.