Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Microcirculatory dysfunction during cardiac surgery remains heterogeneous and inconclusive in current clinical evidence

Microcirculatory dysfunction during cardiac surgery remains heterogeneous and inconclusive in…
Photo by Jannes Jacobs / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that clinical evidence for microcirculatory dysfunction in cardiac surgery remains heterogeneous and inconclusive.

This narrative review addresses microcirculatory dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The scope includes secondary outcomes such as endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, and organ dysfunction. The authors highlight that clinical evidence remains heterogeneous and inconclusive across these domains.

The review notes that clinical use remains limited by technical challenges and a lack of standardized endpoints. Frequently, the evidence relies on indirect evidence of organ dysfunction rather than direct measures of microvascular perfusion. Important gaps remain in translating findings from experimental models to patients, which affects the certainty of conclusions drawn from preclinical studies that often support biologic plausibility but lack clinical confirmation.

The authors suggest that greater integration of bedside imaging and biomarkers with biophysiological principles may help establish microcirculation as both a mechanistic endpoint and a therapeutic target in cardiac surgery. However, the review does not report specific adverse events, sample sizes, or pooled effect sizes for interventions like volatile anesthetics or statins. The overall certainty is low due to the heterogeneous nature of the available clinical data.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a crucial component of cardiac surgery, yet postoperative organ dysfunction remains common despite apparently adequate systemic hemodynamics. This mismatch underscores the importance of the microcirculation, where oxygen delivery and extraction ultimately occur. Increasing evidence suggests that CPB disrupts capillary perfusion through endothelial dysfunction, glycocalyx shedding, inflammation, oxidative stress, hemodilution, functional shunting, and microthromboemboli, thereby causing tissue hypoxia despite normal macro-hemodynamic stability. This review summarizes the physiology of microcirculation and examines the mechanisms by which CPB impairs microvascular function. We also review current tools for microcirculatory assessment, including orthogonal polarization spectral, sidestream dark field, and incident dark field imaging, near-infrared spectroscopy, and circulating biomarkers of endothelial and glycocalyx injury. Although these approaches have improved mechanistic insight, their clinical use remains limited by technical challenges and the lack of standardized endpoints. We further evaluate cardioprotective strategies aimed at preserving microcirculatory function during CPB. These include perfusion and mechanical approaches, ischemic preconditioning, glycocalyx-preserving therapies, and various pharmacologic interventions such as volatile anesthetics, nitric oxide, statins, antioxidants, and antithrombotic agents. Across these domains, preclinical studies often support biologic plausibility, whereas clinical evidence remains heterogeneous and inconclusive and frequently relies on indirect evidence of organ dysfunction rather than direct measures of microvascular perfusion. Important gaps remain in translating findings from experimental models to patients, and greater integration of bedside imaging and biomarkers with biophysiological principles may help establish microcirculation as both a mechanistic endpoint and a therapeutic target in cardiac surgery.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.