Researchers looked at 1,706 high-risk patients who had a procedure to open blocked heart arteries. The study aimed to see if routine functional testing at the one-year mark would improve outcomes, such as preventing death, heart attacks, or hospital stays for unstable angina over a two-year period.
The results showed that routine testing did not significantly change the primary clinical outcomes for patients. This remained true regardless of whether the doctors used specific tools like IVUS or FFR to guide the tests. While the tests did not lower the risk of major heart events, the study did find that patients who received routine testing underwent more invasive procedures, such as coronary angiography and repeat revascularization.
Because this was a prespecified subgroup analysis, the results should be viewed with caution. The main takeaway is that while routine stress testing is common, it did not show a benefit in preventing major heart complications in this group. Patients should talk to their doctors about the specific goals and risks of follow-up testing.