This post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial examined whether sex influences cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, and concomitant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The analysis included 222 patients, of whom 74.8% were men.
The primary composite outcome included cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, urgent revascularization for ischemia, or major bleeding within 2 years. No significant difference was observed between women and men (aOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.25-1.46; 16.1% vs. 21.1%). Secondary outcomes, including all ischemic cardiovascular events, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death, also showed no significant sex differences.
Safety outcomes, including major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage, did not differ significantly between groups. Serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported.
Key limitations include the post hoc design, small sample size, and predominance of male patients (74.8%). The wide confidence intervals indicate imprecision. These results are exploratory and cannot support causal conclusions.
In practice, appropriate medical management may attenuate the influence of biological sex on cardiovascular and bleeding risk in this population. However, these findings require confirmation in larger, prospective studies.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) frequently coexist, but whether clinical outcomes differ by sex in this population remains unclear. We evaluated sex differences in a post hoc analysis of the Optimal Antithrombotic Therapy in Ischemic Stroke Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Atherothrombosis (ATIS-NVAF) trial, a randomized study of patients with recent ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), NVAF, and concomitant ASCVD.
METHODS: Baseline patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared by sex. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, urgent revascularization for ischemia, or major bleeding within 2 years. Secondary outcomes were all ischemic cardiovascular events, ischemic stroke, all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death. The safety outcomes were major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for women versus men.
RESULTS: Of the 222 patients, most were men (74.8%). The primary outcome did not differ significantly between women and men (16.1% vs. 21.1%; aOR, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.46). No significant differences were observed in secondary or safety outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the ATIS-NVAF trial, no significant sex differences were observed in the 2-year composite of cardiovascular and bleeding events among patients with recent ischemic stroke or TIA and concomitant NVAF and ASCVD. Appropriate medical management may attenuate the influence of biological sex on the risk of cardiovascular and bleeding events.