Meta-analysis finds higher target-lesion revascularization with Magmaris scaffold vs. DES in ACS
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the Magmaris bioresorbable magnesium scaffold versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The pairwise analysis included 622 patients (322 Magmaris, 300 DES), with an additional 1,391 patients in single-arm analyses. Follow-up was one year.
The primary outcome, target-lesion failure (composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-lesion revascularization), showed no statistically significant difference between groups (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.79–2.97; p=0.21; 7.5% vs. 5.3%). However, target-lesion revascularization was significantly higher with Magmaris (OR 2.63; 95% CI 1.17–5.90; p=0.019; 6.8% vs. 3.0%). No significant differences were observed for target-vessel myocardial infarction, cardiac death, or scaffold/stent thrombosis. The pooled 1-year incidence of scaffold/stent thrombosis was 0.83%. Procedural success was high at 98.49% (95% CI 97.21–99.18).
The authors note several limitations: limited and heterogeneous evidence, wide confidence intervals, and a small number of included studies. The meta-analysis includes both observational and randomized studies, so findings represent associations only. Certainty is low.
In practice, Magmaris in ACS was associated with low observed stent thrombosis rates, but comparative safety and efficacy versus DES remain uncertain. The higher target-lesion revascularization rates suggest technical improvements are needed before it can be considered a robust alternative.