Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Aumolertinib Combined with Chemotherapy Improves Progression Free Survival in EGFR Mutated NSCLCCombination therapy extends progression free survival in lung cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Aumolertinib plus chemotherapy significantly improves progression-free survival in EGFR-mutated NSCLC compared to monotherapy.

This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of aumolertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations, specifically exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations. The study enrolled 624 patients who were randomized to receive either aumolertinib monotherapy at 110 mg daily or a combination regimen of aumolertinib with pemetrexed and either cisplatin or carboplatin.

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Results demonstrated a substantial clinical benefit for the dual therapy approach. Patients receiving the combined treatment achieved a median PFS of 28.9 months, compared to 18.9 months for those receiving only aumolertinib. This difference was statistically significant with a hazard ratio of 0.47 (95% CI 0.37-0.60; p < 0.0001), indicating a substantial reduction in the risk of disease progression.

From a safety perspective, the addition of chemotherapy increased the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events compared to the single agent. Specifically, patients receiving the combination therapy experienced more frequent instances of neutropenia (55% vs 1%), leukopenia (34% vs <1%), and thrombocytopenia (20% vs 1%). While these toxicities were higher in the multi-drug cohort, they were manageable through standard supportive care and dose modifications.

Serious adverse events occurred in 36% of those receiving combination therapy versus 17% in the monotherapy group. The most common serious issues included platelet count decreases, neutrophil count decreases, white blood cell count decreases, and anemia. Despite these higher rates of toxicity, the clinical benefit in terms of progression-free survival suggests that the combination remains a potent option for managing advanced NSCLC. The study provides high-certainty evidence due to its large sample size and randomized design. While overall survival data is not yet fully established at this stage, the significant improvement in PFS marks a notable milestone for patients with EGFR mutations. Clinicians may consider the combination of aumolertinib and chemotherapy as a robust strategy to delay progression in this specific patient population.

In conclusion, adding pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy to aumolertinib provides a significant survival advantage over monotherapy. The management of increased toxicities is essential when choosing the combination route. Further long-term follow-up will be necessary to confirm if these progression-free survival gains translate into improved overall survival for patients with advanced NSCLC.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence This study addresses a gap in treatment options for EGFR-mutated NSCLC by providing high-certainty data on aumolertinib combination therapy. While previous findings noted that hypertension is the most common CVAE for osimertinib and that combination therapies may increase QTc and LVEF risks, this trial specifically quantifies the progression-free survival benefit of adding chemotherapy to an EGFR-inhibitor (aumolertinib) while documenting the associated increase in hematologic toxicities.

For people living with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, every month of stable health is precious. When the cancer has specific mutations, doctors look for ways to slow its growth and keep it from spreading. A recent large study looked at a way to give these patients more time by combining a targeted medication called aumolertinib with standard chemotherapy.

The researchers conducted a Phase 3 trial involving over 600 patients in China who had advanced or metastatic lung cancer. These patients all had specific genetic mutations that make them eligible for certain targeted treatments. The study split these patients into two groups: one group received only the drug aumolertinib, while the other group received a combination of aumolertinib plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed with either cisplatin or carboplatin).

The results showed a significant difference in how long the cancer stayed stable. Patients who received the combination therapy saw their cancer stay stable for an average of 28.9 months. In contrast, those who took only the single drug had their disease remain stable for about 18.9 months. This means the combination and the targeted drug together helped keep the cancer from progressing for a much longer period than the single drug alone.

However, there is a trade-off to consider regarding safety. The combination therapy was linked to more serious side effects compared to the single drug. Specifically, patients in the combination group were more likely to experience significant drops in white blood cell counts and platelet counts. These are important cells that help fight infection and stop bleeding. While these issues were managed by doctors using dose adjustments and extra treatments, they show that the stronger treatment comes with a higher risk of physical strain.

It is important to keep expectations realistic. While the results for progression-free survival are very positive, the study did not yet have enough data to confirm if this combination also leads to longer overall survival. Because the trial was still ongoing at the time of data collection, we cannot say for certain how much longer it extends life in total.

For patients today, this means that a combination approach is a powerful tool for managing advanced lung cancer with specific mutations. It offers a way to keep the disease stable for a longer period than monotherapy alone, though it requires careful monitoring by doctors to manage the increased side effects of chemotherapy.

What this means for you:
Combining aumolertinib with chemotherapy significantly extended time without progression for patients with certain lung cancers.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 1,011
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Although third-generation epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first-line therapies for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), their effectiveness is often limited by the emergence of drug resistance and subsequent disease progression. Given the previously established clinical efficacy and adverse event profile of aumolertinib, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse event profile of aumolertinib in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy versus aumolertinib monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitive mutations. METHODS: The open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 AENEAS2 trial was done across 60 hospitals in China. Patients aged at least 18 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1; treatment-naive; histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harbouring EGFR-sensitive mutations (ex19del/L858R with or without other EGFR mutations) were eligible. Brain metastases were allowed if neurologically stable. Previous EGFR-TKI therapy was an exclusion criterion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with block randomisation (block size of 6), stratified by EGFR mutation type and baseline brain metastasis, to receive aumolertinib monotherapy (110 mg orally once a day) or combination therapy (aumolertinib 110 mg orally once a day plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m intravenously with cisplatin [75 mg/m] or carboplatin [area under the plasma concentration-time curve 5] intravenously on day 1 of 21-day cycles for 4-6 cycles), followed by maintenance therapy (aumolertinib 110 mg orally once a day and pemetrexed 500 mg/m intravenously once every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR; RECIST version 1.1). Efficacy was analysed in the full-analysis set, which included all randomly assigned patients, and safety was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of the actual trial treatment. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04923906, and is ongoing, but closed to enrolment. FINDINGS: Between Aug 4, 2021, to June 18, 2024, of 1011 patients assessed for eligibility, 624 randomly assigned patients (median age 59·0 years [IQR 52·0-66·0]; 337 [54%] were female, 287 [46%] were male) were randomly assigned. 310 (50%) patients received combination therapy and 314 (50%) received monotherapy. As of the data cutoff date (June 18, 2024), the median follow-up was 23·4 months (IQR 20·5-26·5), In the full-analysis set, median BICR-assessed progression-free survival was 28·9 months (95% CI 26.3, NA) in the combination therapy versus 18·9 months (17·8-21·1) in the monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0·47, 95% CI 0·37-0·60; log-rank p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (occurring in at least 20% in any group) were neutrophil count decreased (168 [55%] of 304 in the combination group versus four [1%] of 316 in monotherapy group), white blood cell count decreased (103 [34%] vs one [<1%]), and platelet count decreased (62 [20%] vs two [1%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 109 (36%) patients in the combination group and 53 (17%) in the monotherapy group, the most common of which were platelet count decreased (22 [7%] vs 0), neutrophil count decreased (17 [6%] vs 0), white blood cell count decreased (13 [4%] vs 0), and anaemia (ten [3%] vs two [1%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in one (<1%) patient in the combination group (encephalopathy) and two (1%) in the monotherapy group (pulmonary embolism and respiratory failure with circulatory collapse). INTERPRETATION: Aumolertinib in combination with chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival. Although this regimen was associated with increased toxicity, the side-effects were managed with dose adjustment and supportive treatment aligned with clinical practice. Long-term follow-up is required to assess overall survival. The AENEAS2 study provides evidence to guide clinical practice regarding EGFR-TKIs and their combination use in treating patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. FUNDING: Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical Group, and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Clinical and Translational Science by Ministry of Education & Shanghai. TRANSLATIONS: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.