A systematic review examined pre-clinical studies on how cannabidiol (CBD) affects cancer cells in dogs. The research focused on lymphoma, mammary cancer, glioma, prostate cancer, osteosarcoma, and urothelial carcinoma. These studies were mostly based on cellular models rather than living animals or people. The review found that CBD exerts antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects, meaning it can slow cancer cell growth and encourage cell death. It also modulates intracellular signaling pathways like ERK, JNK, and caspases. Additionally, the review noted that CBD can have synergistic or antagonistic effects when combined with other drugs. Safety data indicated that CBD was safe and well-tolerated in these pre-clinical settings. However, the review highlighted that fewer publications are available for dogs compared to humans. There was also no comprehensive review of findings performed prior to this study. The authors noted a need to better elucidate mechanisms and standardize concentrations and formulations. Readers should understand that these findings highlight potential uses but do not prove effectiveness in real-world dog patients yet.
Systematic review of preclinical CBD effects in canine cancersLab tests suggest CBD may help treat cancer in dogs
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This is a systematic review of preclinical studies examining cannabidiol (CBD) for various canine cancers, including lymphoma, mammary cancer, glioma, prostate cancer, osteosarcoma, and urothelial carcinoma. The authors synthesized evidence that CBD exerts antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects and modulates intracellular signaling pathways, including ERK, JNK, and caspases. They also noted that CBD can have synergistic and antagonistic effects when combined with other drugs.
The review highlights significant limitations. The evidence is based on pre-clinical studies, mostly cellular models, with fewer publications available compared to human studies. No comprehensive review of these findings was performed prior to this study. The authors note a need to better elucidate mechanisms and to standardize concentrations and formulations.
Safety data were not reported, but the authors state that CBD was safe and well-tolerated in dogs. The practice relevance is restrained, with the authors supporting potential clinical use based on safety and tolerability in dogs. However, they caution against overstating potential clinical use or positioning CBD as an anticancer agent across different cancer types. The findings highlight potential associations, but causation is not explicitly distinguished.