Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

BAT2306 shows comparable efficacy and safety to secukinumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasisTrial shows BAT2306 performs similarly to secukinumab for plaque psoriasis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that BAT2306 shows comparable efficacy and safety to secukinumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

This Phase 3 randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BAT2306 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. The study was conducted in a multicentre setting across 49 sites in four different countries. The study population consisted of 502 adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis.

The primary objective was to compare the percentage change from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score for patients treated with BAT2306 versus those treated with secukinumab. The primary endpoint was assessed at week 8 (EMA) and week 12 (FDA/NMPA).

Regarding the primary outcome, the results showed that the percentage change from baseline in PASI scores at week 8 was similar across the BAT2306 and secukinumab groups. The least square mean difference was 1.549, with a 95% CI of -0.954 to 4.051. At week 12, the results also showed similar outcomes between the two groups. The least square mean difference at week 12 was -0.349, with a 90% CI of -2.221 to 1.523 and a 95% CI of -2.579 to 1.881.

Secondary outcomes included assessments of safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. The study reported 1452 treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis. The study concluded that the safety profiles for BAT2306 and secukinumab were comparable. Data regarding serious adverse events and specific discontinuation rates were not reported.

These results align with the established role of secukinumab in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. While secukinumab is a known effective treatment, these data suggest that BAT2306 provides a comparable alternative in terms of both efficacy and tolerability. The data specifically indicate that switching from secukinumab to BAT2306 did not affect clinical outcomes.

Methodological limitations noted in the study include the fact that individuals with lived experience were not involved in the design of the study. Additionally, the specific follow-up duration was not reported. These factors should be considered when interpreting the long-term durability of the observed effects.

Clinical implications for practice suggest that BAT2306 may be considered a viable option for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who require treatment comparable to secukinumab. The finding that switching from secukinumab to BAT2306 did not affect outcomes may be relevant for patients requiring a change in regimen. However, questions remain regarding the long-term durability of these results and the specific immunogenicity profiles of BAT2306 compared to secukinumab.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence This study confirms that secukinumab remains an effective treatment for plaque psoriasis, consistent with previous findings that secukinumab ranks highly for PASI 75 and PASI 90. It also extends the range of available options for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, similar to the efficacy seen with SSGJ-608. The results provide a direct comparison to secukinumab, a known standard in the treatment of plaque psoriasis.

Living with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis can be a daily challenge for many people. It is a chronic skin condition that causes itchy, scaly patches and can impact a person's comfort and confidence. Because of these challenges, finding effective treatments that work well and are safe is very important for patients looking for long term management of their symptoms.

To test a new treatment option, researchers conducted a Phase 3 clinical trial involving 502 adults with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis. The study was conducted across 49 different sites in four different countries. The goal was to see how a new medication called BAT2306 compared to a well-known treatment called secukinumab. The researchers measured the success of both drugs by looking at the percentage of improvement in skin symptoms over a period of 8 to 12 weeks.

The results of the study showed that BAT2306 performed very similarly to secukinumab. At the 8-week mark, the change in skin severity scores was nearly the same for patients taking BAT2306 as it was for those taking secukinumab. These results remained consistent at the 12-week mark as well. This suggests that both medications are effective at reducing the signs of psoriasis. Additionally, the study looked at how patients tolerated the medications. While there were some common issues like upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis, the safety profiles for both BAT2306 and secukinumab were found to be comparable.

It is important to keep a few things in mind when looking at these results. While the study shows that BAT2306 is an effective option, it is only one study. Furthermore, the study did not involve people with lived experience in the design process, which means the patient perspective was not part of the initial planning. Because this is a specific clinical trial, the results may not apply to everyone with every type of psoriasis.

For patients right now, this research means there is another option that performs similarly to a known standard of care. If a patient is currently using secukinumab, the data suggests that switching to BAT2306 would not change the expected outcomes for their skin. Patients should always speak with their healthcare provider to decide which treatment is best for their specific needs and medical history.

What this means for you:
BAT2306 showed similar effectiveness and safety to secukinumab for treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 502
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Secukinumab is licensed for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in adults. BAT2306 is a proposed biosimilar to reference secukinumab. We aimed to compare the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of BAT2306 with secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial at 49 sites in four countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 300 mg BAT2306 or secukinumab subcutaneously at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, followed by dosing every 4 weeks up to week 40. After the initial 24-week treatment period (ie, treatment period one) eligible patients in the BAT2306 group continued with BAT2306 (BAT2306-BAT2306 group) in the second 28-week treatment period (ie, treatment period two), whereas eligible patients in the secukinumab group were re-randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either secukinumab (secukinumab-secukinumab group) or BAT2306 (secukinumab-BAT2306 group) during treatment period two. The primary endpoint was to determine equivalent efficacy of BAT2306 and secukinumab by measuring the percentage change from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score to week 8 (as per the European Medicines Agency [EMA] requirements) or to week 12 (as per the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and the China National Medical Products Administration [NMPA] requirements) using prespecified equivalence margins (95% CI -13 to 13 [EMA and NMPA] and 90% CI -12 to 10 [FDA]). The safety endpoints were assessed from baseline to week 52. Individuals with lived experience were not involved in the design of this study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05377944, and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Oct 13, 2022, and May 24, 2024, a total of 502 patients were randomly allocated: 252 (50%) to the BAT2306 group and 250 (50%) to the secukinumab group in treatment period one. Of 474 patients entering treatment period two, 118 (25%) patients were assigned to the secukinumab-secukinumab group, 113 (24%) to the secukinumab-BAT2306 group, and 243 (51%) to the BAT2306-BAT2306 group. Mean age was 44·5 years (SD 13·8), 359 (72%) of 502 patients were male, 143 (28%) were female, and 325 (65%) were Asian. The primary endpoint of the study was met. The percentage change from baseline in PASI scores was similar across the BAT2306 and secukinumab groups with a least square mean difference of 1·549 (95% CI of -0·954 to 4·051) at week 8, and -0·349 (90% CI of -2·221 to 1·523 and 95% CI -2·579 to 1·881) at week 12, which were within the equivalence margins set by EMA, FDA, and NMPA, respectively. Comparable safety, pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity profiles were observed for BAT2306 and secukinumab. 375 (75%) of 502 patients had 1452 treatment-emergent adverse events during the study. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper respiratory tract infections and nasopharyngitis. INTERPRETATION: BAT2306 showed comparable efficacy and safety profiles to those of secukinumab. Switching from secukinumab to BAT2306 did not affect outcomes, supporting BAT2306 as a biosimilar option to improve treatment accessibility. FUNDING: Bio-Thera Solutions.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.