Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Metabolic subtypes identify Japanese adults with prediabetes at highest or lowest T2D riskJapanese adults with prediabetes benefit most from lifestyle changes in one specific metabolic group

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note metabolic subtypes to identify Japanese adults with prediabetes at highest or lowest T2D risk

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 295 Japanese adults with impaired glucose tolerance within the Japanese Diabetes Prevention Program. The study population was stratified into three metabolic subtypes to evaluate incident type 2 diabetes risk. Follow-up duration extended up to 6 years.

Participants were assigned to lifestyle intervention or a comparator group, though the specific comparator was not reported. The primary outcome measured incident type 2 diabetes. Secondary outcomes included metabolic subtypes and response to lifestyle interventions.

Results indicated that Cluster 1 (MRP) showed the lowest T2D risk, while Cluster 2 (IIP) showed the highest T2D risk. Cluster 3 (SIRP) showed intermediate risk. Absolute numbers were Cluster 1: n=127, Cluster 2: n=109, and Cluster 3: n=59. The benefit from lifestyle intervention was greatest in Cluster 2 (IIP), with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.40. The 95% CI was 0.17-0.95, and the P value was less than 0.05.

Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported. Key limitations included the lack of reported comparator details and absence of p-value or confidence interval reporting for the primary cluster comparison. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. These results support a precision prevention framework for Japanese adults with prediabetes.

Researchers studied 295 Japanese adults who had impaired glucose tolerance, a condition often called prediabetes. They grouped these patients into three different categories based on their metabolic health. The goal was to see how well lifestyle changes helped prevent type 2 diabetes in each group.

After following the patients for up to six years, the study found clear differences between the groups. One group had the highest risk of developing diabetes, while another had the lowest risk even without extra help. The middle group had a risk level that was somewhere in between.

The most important finding was that lifestyle changes worked very well for the group with the highest initial risk. These patients saw a big drop in their chance of getting diabetes. This suggests that doctors should look closely at a patient's specific metabolic pattern before deciding on a prevention plan. This approach helps ensure that the right advice is given to the right people.

What this means for you:
Lifestyle changes helped prevent diabetes best in Japanese adults with a specific metabolic pattern.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIM: To identify distinct metabolic subtypes among Japanese adults with prediabetes and examine their association with type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk and response to lifestyle interventions. METHODS: Data from 295 adults with impaired glucose tolerance (mean age 50.4 ± 14.6 years) enrolled in the Japanese Diabetes Prevention Program, a randomized controlled trial with up to 6 years of follow-up, were analyzed. Participants with a history of diabetes, gastrectomy, or exercise contraindications were excluded from the study. K-means clustering (k = 2-5) was applied to baseline indices, including HbA1c, HOMA-β, HOMA-IR, and HDL-cholesterol. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for interpretation. Incident T2D was defined as a repeat 75-g OGTT. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were adjusted for baseline HbA1c estimated cumulative incidence and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: Three clusters emerged at k = 3, and PCA (two components explaining 68.0% of the variance) clearly separated the clusters based on insulin resistance and glycemic indices. Cluster 1, Metabolically Resilient Prediabetes (n = 127, MRP), showed the most favorable metabolic profile and lowest T2D risk. Cluster 2, Insulin-Insufficient Prediabetes (n = 109, IIP), exhibited reduced β-cell function and the highest T2D risk, but derived the greatest benefit from lifestyle intervention (adjusted HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, P < 0.05). Cluster 3, Severe Insulin-Resistant Prediabetes (SIRP; n = 59), displayed obesity-related insulin resistance and an intermediate risk. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised clustering identified three biologically distinct prediabetic subtypes that differed in diabetes risk and intervention responsiveness, supporting a precision prevention framework for Japanese adults with prediabetes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.