Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

HLA-B*57:01-guided abacavir prescribing is the clearest preventive paradigm from HLA associations

HLA-B*57:01-guided abacavir prescribing is the clearest preventive paradigm from HLA associations
Photo by Google DeepMind / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider HLA-B*57:01 screening for abacavir; other HLA associations need more evidence for clinical use.

This narrative review synthesizes evidence on HLA polymorphisms across HIV, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B. The authors identify HLA-B*57:01-guided abacavir prescribing as the clearest preventive paradigm, with dapsone hypersensitivity and flucloxacillin-induced liver injury as high-signal examples of HLA association. For HIV, HCV, and hepatitis B vaccine responses, the strongest evidence indicates that HLA shapes clinically relevant host-response heterogeneity.

The review notes that individual-level clinical translation is often limited for infection and vaccine associations. Large effect sizes do not always justify routine screening. Clinical relevance depends on whether an association changes treatment or prevention decisions.

No pooled effect sizes are reported. The review does not describe a specific study population, sample size, or follow-up duration. Safety signals include dapsone hypersensitivity and flucloxacillin-induced liver injury, but serious adverse events and discontinuations are not reported.

Practice relevance is restrained: while HLA-B*57:01 screening is established, other HLA associations require further validation before clinical implementation.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) polymorphisms are central to anti-infective pharmacogenetics and to inter-individual variability in infection outcomes and vaccine responses, but clinical relevance depends on whether an association changes treatment or prevention decisions. This narrative review is organized around two complementary pillars: first, severe, typically T cell–mediated adverse drug reactions to anti-infective agents, where HLA can support prevention when genetic effect, phenotype precision, and therapeutic alternatives converge; and second, selected, replicated HLA-region associations with infection outcomes or vaccine immunogenicity, where biological effects may be robust yet individual-level clinical translation is often limited. Within the adverse drug reaction pillar, the clearest preventive paradigm remains HLA-B*57:01-guided abacavir prescribing, with additional high-signal examples including dapsone hypersensitivity and flucloxacillin-induced liver injury that illustrate how large effect sizes do not always justify routine screening. Within the infection and vaccine pillar, HIV, HCV, and hepatitis B vaccine response provide the strongest evidence that HLA shapes clinically relevant host-response heterogeneity. Across both domains, the key pharmacological distinction is between mechanistically persuasive associations and those that are sufficiently robust, transportable, and decision-relevant to change practice.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.