Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron may improve mean volume voided incontinence episodes in overactive bladderCombination Therapy May Improve Overactive Bladder Management

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider mirabegron 50 mg for long-term overactive bladder management due to a more favorable safety profile than solifenacin.

This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of solifenacin monotherapy, mirabegron monotherapy, and combination therapy (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) for patients with overactive bladder. The study focuses on changes in mean volume voided incontinence episodes per 24 h and micturition frequency per 24 h.

The analysis suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than either monotherapy in improving mean volume voided (MVV) and reducing both mean incontinence episodes and micturition frequency. Regarding safety, solifenacin was associated with a higher risk of constipation (RR 2.46; 95%CI 1.16-5.19, P=0.02) and potentially higher risk of dry mouth (RR 1.73; 95%CI 0.91-3.30, P=0.10) compared to mirabegron. Conversely, solifenacin was associated with a lower incidence of dizziness (RR 0.08; 95%CI 0.01-0.62, P=0.02).

A primary limitation noted is that efficacy data were presented as narrative synthesis due to substantial heterogeneity (I2>58%). Furthermore, the findings cannot be generalized to other muscarinic receptor antagonists or beta3-adrenoceptor agonists. Mirabegron 50 mg appears to offer a more favorable profile for long-term management compared to solifenacin due to lower rates of certain treatment-limiting adverse drug reactions.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in the current evidence regarding pharmacological management of overactive bladder. While previous findings have explored non-pharmacological interventions, such as auricular thumbtack needle therapy plus behavioral therapy and TTNS plus behavior therapy for symptom reduction, this study provides data on specific drug combinations. It specifically compares solifenacin and mirabegron monotherapies against combination therapy to determine the most effective long-term management strategy.

Researchers analyzed several studies to compare how different treatments work for overactive bladder. They looked at two common medications, solifenacin and mirabegron, both on their own and used together as a combination therapy. The goal was to see which method best improved the amount of urine held before an accident and reduced how often a person needed to urinate.

The results suggest that using both drugs together may be more effective than using just one at a time for managing these symptoms. However, different medications carry different risks. For example, solifenacin was linked to a higher risk of constipation and dry mouth compared to mirabegron. On the other hand, patients taking solifenacin reported less dizziness than those on mirabegron.

Because this study looked at specific drugs, the findings may not apply to all medications used for overactive bladder. Additionally, because the data from different studies varied significantly, the results should be viewed as a general guide rather than a definitive rule. Patients should talk to their doctor to decide which treatment plan is safest and most effective for their specific needs.

What this means for you:
Combination therapy may improve symptoms more than single drugs, but side effects vary by medication type.

Common questions

Is the combination of solifenacin and mirabegron more effective?

The study suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than using either solifenacin or mirabegron alone. It may help improve the volume of urine held before an accident and reduce how often a person needs to urinate.

What are the side effects of these medications?

Solifenacin was associated with a higher risk of constipation and dry mouth compared to mirabegron. However, solifenacin was linked to a lower incidence of dizziness than mirabegron.

Which medication is better for long-term use?

Mirabegron 50 mg appears to offer a favorable profile for long-term management because it had a lower incidence of certain treatment-limiting side effects compared to solifenacin.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundCurrent clinical guidelines recommend either muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenoceptor agonists for overactive bladder (OAB) treatment. These recommendations, however, are primarily based on short-term (12-week) clinical trials, leaving a critical gap in evidence regarding their long-term (≥1 year) efficacy and safety. Moreover, the long-term evidence synthesized here is limited to solifenacin and mirabegron, and its generalizability to other agents remains uncertain.ObjectiveTo systematically compare the long-term efficacy and safety of solifenacin monotherapy, mirabegron monotherapy, and their combination in patients with OAB.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical studies published from inception to 2 April 2026. Two reviewers independently screened, selected, and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) tool. The primary outcomes were changes from baseline in mean volume voided incontinence episodes per 24 h, and micturition frequency per 24 h. The secondary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related adverse drug reactions Quantitative meta-analysis was performed only for safety outcomes using a random-effects model. For the primary efficacy outcomes, substantial heterogeneity (I2>58%) across the included studies precluded meaningful pooling, therefore, a narrative synthesis of efficacy data was presented.ResultsInitial screening identified 7,451 articles, of which five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. For long-term OAB management, combination therapy (solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg) may be more effective than each monotherapy in improving MVV and reducing mean incontinence episodes and micturition frequency. Compared to mirabegron 50mg, solifenacin 5 mg was associated with a potentially higher risk of ADRs such as dry mouth (RR 1.73, 95%CI 0.91–3.30, P = 0.10) and constipation (RR 2.46, 95%CI 1.16–5.19, P = 0.02), but a lower incidence of dizziness (RR 0.08, 95%CI 0.01–0.62, P = 0.02). Solifenacin 5 mg was associated with a lower risk of constipation and dry mouth compared to solifenacin 10 mg.ConclusionFor long-term OAB pharmacotherapy with the specific regimens evaluated, mirabegron 50 mg appears to offer a favorable profile due to its comparable efficacy and lower incidence of certain treatment-limiting ADRs. However, these findings cannot be generalized to other muscarinic receptor antagonists or β3-adrenoceptor agonists.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251056532, identifier CRD420251056532.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.