Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Corticosteroids in cirrhotic shock show no mortality benefit but increase bleeding and organ failure risk

Corticosteroids in cirrhotic shock show no mortality benefit but increase bleeding and organ failure…
Photo by Ian Talmacs / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that corticosteroids in cirrhotic shock improve shock metrics but not survival and may increase bleeding/organ failure.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined low-dose corticosteroids versus control in 514 cirrhotic patients with septic shock or vasopressor-dependent distributive shock. The analysis pooled data from 6 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational cohorts), with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome. The evidence shows association, not definitive causality, and has heterogeneity (I² up to 58.6%).

Low-dose corticosteroids showed no effect on in-hospital mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.13; p = 0.832). However, they were associated with a reduced risk of refractory shock-related mortality (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06-0.41; p < 0.001) and increased shock resolution (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.13-1.78; p = 0.003). There was no significant benefit for vasopressor-free days (mean difference: 2.06; 95% CI: -0.86 to 4.99; p = 0.166).

Safety signals were concerning. Corticosteroid use was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.15-6.52; p = 0.023) and new organ failure (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99; p = 0.045). Key limitations, funding sources, and conflicts of interest were not reported in the input data.

For practice, the central finding is that improved shock-related outcomes did not translate into a survival benefit, while the risk of significant adverse events increased. This creates a complex risk-benefit profile. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously due to the mixed evidence base and inherent limitations of the included observational studies.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 514
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: To analyze whether the use of low-dose corticosteroids in cirrhotic patients with septic shock or other forms of vasopressor-dependent distributive shock translates into significant clinical benefits and reduced in-hospital mortality. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the use of corticosteroids versus control in cirrhotic patients with septic shock or other distributive vasopressor-dependent shock. Outcomes were analyzed using risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) and mean differences (MD). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic. RESULTS: Six studies (2 RCTs, 4 observational cohorts), totaling 514 patients, were included. Corticosteroids had no effect on in-hospital mortality (RR: 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.86-1.13; p = 0.832; I = 46.2 %), but reduced refractory shock related mortality (RR: 0.16; 95 % CI: 0.06-0.41; p < 0.001; I = 0 %) and increased shock resolution (RR: 1.42; 95 % CI: 1.13-1.78; p = 0.003; I = 52.3 %). No benefit was observed in vasopressor-free days (MD: 2.06; 95 % CI: -0.86 to 4.99; p = 0.166; I = 58.6 %). Adverse events were higher for gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 2.73; 95 % CI: 1.15-6.52; p = 0.023; I = 0 %) and new organ failure (RR: 1.42; 95 % CI: 1.01-1.99; p = 0.045; I = 0 %). CONCLUSION: Low-dose corticosteroids in cirrhotic patients with septic or vasopressor-dependent distributive shock show limited benefit, as improved shock resolution and reduced shock-related mortality did not translate into in-hospital survival and may increase the risk of severe adverse events.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.