Corticosteroids in cirrhotic shock show no mortality benefit but increase bleeding and organ failure risk
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined low-dose corticosteroids versus control in 514 cirrhotic patients with septic shock or vasopressor-dependent distributive shock. The analysis pooled data from 6 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational cohorts), with in-hospital mortality as the primary outcome. The evidence shows association, not definitive causality, and has heterogeneity (I² up to 58.6%).
Low-dose corticosteroids showed no effect on in-hospital mortality (relative risk [RR]: 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.13; p = 0.832). However, they were associated with a reduced risk of refractory shock-related mortality (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06-0.41; p < 0.001) and increased shock resolution (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.13-1.78; p = 0.003). There was no significant benefit for vasopressor-free days (mean difference: 2.06; 95% CI: -0.86 to 4.99; p = 0.166).
Safety signals were concerning. Corticosteroid use was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.15-6.52; p = 0.023) and new organ failure (RR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99; p = 0.045). Key limitations, funding sources, and conflicts of interest were not reported in the input data.
For practice, the central finding is that improved shock-related outcomes did not translate into a survival benefit, while the risk of significant adverse events increased. This creates a complex risk-benefit profile. Clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously due to the mixed evidence base and inherent limitations of the included observational studies.