Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review on genetic factors in treatment-resistant schizophreniaGenetic factors linked to treatment-resistant schizophrenia in European ancestry

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that genetic associations with treatment-resistant schizophrenia are preliminary and limited by heterogeneity.

This is a systematic review of genetic studies on treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). The scope includes common variants, rare variants, copy number variants, polygenic risk scores, gene expression, and epigenetic markers. The authors synthesized evidence from 102 studies, predominantly in individuals of European genetic ancestry.

Key findings indicate that common variants, such as those from GWAS or polygenic risk scores, explain only a small proportion of TRS liability. Higher schizophrenia polygenic risk scores are associated with TRS, and specific rare variants and copy number variants are also associated. TRS-specific polygenic risk scores remain in development. GWAS have largely focused on schizophrenia broadly, showing substantial genetic overlap between TRS and schizophrenia. Transcriptomic and epigenomic data provide additional but limited insights, often confounded by drug exposure.

Limitations noted by the authors include heterogeneous TRS definitions, limited ancestry diversity (predominantly European), and scarce robust TRS-specific genetic markers. The review is based on observational and genetic studies, with certainty not quantified. Practice relevance suggests that harmonized criteria and larger, diverse cohorts are needed; integrating genetic, epigenetic, and clinical data could improve early risk identification and guide precision treatment strategies. Associations are reported, but causation is not established.

A large review of 102 studies looked at genetics in people with schizophrenia, mostly of European ancestry, to understand treatment-resistant forms. The research found that higher polygenic risk scores, which measure genetic burden, are linked to a greater chance of treatment resistance. Specific rare genetic variants and copy number changes were also associated with this condition.

However, common genetic variants only explained a small part of the risk for treatment resistance. The tools to predict this specific outcome are still being developed. Most genetic studies focus on schizophrenia in general, showing strong overlap between treatment-responsive and resistant forms.

Other genetic data, like gene expression and epigenetic markers, offered some insights but were often limited by the effects of medication. The main limitation is that most studies involved people of European descent, so results may not apply to other groups. Definitions of treatment resistance also varied between studies.

To improve care, researchers need more diverse groups and consistent criteria. Combining genetic, biological, and clinical information could help identify risk earlier and guide personalized treatment. This review shows associations, not cause-and-effect, and the evidence certainty is not fully measured.

What this means for you:
Genetic factors are connected to treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but more diverse research is needed for better predictions.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThis scoping review synthesized the current evidence on the genetic architecture of treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). TRS is typically characterized by an inadequate response to antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia. Approximately 30% of individuals with schizophrenia develop treatment resistance, which is associated with greater disability, poorer prognosis, and increased mortality compared to treatment-responsive schizophrenia. Numerous studies have explored various genetic aspects of TRS; therefore, a scoping review was needed to summarize findings and consistent patterns, clarify the current level of understanding, and highlight remaining knowledge gaps.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed up to March 2025. This scoping review followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on genetic factors of TRS and its related constructs (clozapine resistance). Data on treatment resistance, study design, population characteristics, and genetic findings were extracted and synthesized.ResultsA total of 102 studies were included. Definitions of TRS varied across studies, with most using proxies such as clozapine use, antipsychotic polypharmacy, or they used presence of symptoms despite antipsychotic treatment. Most studies compared TRS with treatment-responsive schizophrenia and predominately included participants of European genetic ancestry. Genetic findings spanned common variants (e.g., identified from genome-wide association studies or in cumulative measures such as polygenic risk scores [PRS]), rare variants, and copy number variants and functional genomics such as gene expression and epigenetic markers. Common variants dominated the literature but explained only a small proportion of TRS liability. Higher schizophrenia PRS, specific rare variants, and copy number variants were associated with TRS, while TRS-specific PRS remain in development. GWAS largely focused on schizophrenia broadly, with substantial genetic overlap between TRS and schizophrenia. Transcriptomic and epigenomic data provide additional but limited insights, often confounded by drug exposure.ConclusionHeterogeneous TRS definitions and limited ancestry diversity constrain progress, and robust TRS-specific genetic markers remain scarce. Harmonized criteria and larger, diverse cohorts are needed. Integrating genetic, epigenetic, and clinical data could improve early risk identification and guide precision treatment strategies.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.