Researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 1,172 adults living with HIV who were admitted to hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. The goal was to see if an expanded screening strategy, which included testing sputum, stool, and urine for tuberculosis, would improve outcomes compared to the standard of care.
The study found no significant difference between the two groups. Specifically, the proportion of patients starting treatment within 72 hours was nearly identical in both groups. Additionally, the time to start treatment and the 8-week mortality rates did not show a significant difference between those who received expanded screening and those who received standard care.
Because the results showed no significant difference, this study suggests that adding extra tests like stool and urine screening did not change the speed of care or survival rates in this specific hospital setting. These results are important for understanding how to best manage tuberculosis in patients with HIV.