Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Expanded TB Screening in HIV Inpatients Shows No BenefitExpanded Screening Does Not Speed Tuberculosis Treatment for HIV Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Expanded TB screening in HIV-positive inpatients did not improve treatment initiation or survival compared to standard care.

A randomized controlled trial across 11 hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique evaluated an expanded tuberculosis (TB) screening strategy for adults living with HIV. The intervention included Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing on sputum, stool, and urine, plus lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) testing, regardless of symptoms. This was compared to standard symptom-based testing with sputum Xpert Ultra and LF-LAM.

Among 1172 participants, the primary outcome—microbiologically confirmed TB starting treatment within 72 hours—occurred in 16.0% of the intervention group versus 15.3% in the control group (difference 0.7%, 95% CI -3.4 to 4.8, p=0.73). No significant difference was found.

Secondary outcomes also showed no benefit. Eight-week all-cause mortality was 25.8% in the intervention group and 28.8% in the control group (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.07, p=0.18). Median time to TB treatment initiation was similar (0.98 vs 0.92 days, hazard ratio 1.05, p=0.72).

The expanded screening strategy did not improve TB treatment initiation or reduce mortality in this high-risk population. These findings suggest that more intensive diagnostic approaches may not translate into better outcomes in hospital settings with existing standard protocols. Further research is needed to identify effective strategies for this vulnerable group.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in the clinical utility of expanded screening protocols for tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients. While other covered evidence highlights the efficacy of specific tools like the TB-TST mobile application for treatment success or WGS-based tools for resistance detection, this trial indicates that expanding the sample types (stool and urine) in a hospital setting did not improve the proportion of patients starting treatment within 72 hours or reduce 8-week mortality.

Researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 1,172 adults living with HIV who were admitted to hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. The goal was to see if an expanded screening strategy, which included testing sputum, stool, and urine for tuberculosis, would improve outcomes compared to the standard of care.

The study found no significant difference between the two groups. Specifically, the proportion of patients starting treatment within 72 hours was nearly identical in both groups. Additionally, the time to start treatment and the 8-week mortality rates did not show a significant difference between those who received expanded screening and those who received standard care.

Because the results showed no significant difference, this study suggests that adding extra tests like stool and urine screening did not change the speed of care or survival rates in this specific hospital setting. These results are important for understanding how to best manage tuberculosis in patients with HIV.

What this means for you:
Expanded screening did not improve treatment speed or survival rates for patients with HIV and tuberculosis.

Common questions

Did the expanded screening help patients start treatment faster?

No, the study found no significant difference in the speed of treatment. In the intervention group, 16.0% of patients started treatment within 72 hours, compared to 15.3% in the control group. The median time to start treatment was 0.98 days for the intervention group and 0.92 days for the control group.

Did the extra tests reduce the risk of death?

The study did not find a significant difference in 8-week all-cause mortality. The mortality rate was 25.8% in the intervention group and 28.8% in the control group. Because the results were not statistically significant, the extra tests did not show a clear benefit for survival.

Who was included in this study?

The study included 1,172 adults living with HIV who were admitted to 11 hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. The participants were divided into two groups to compare an expanded screening strategy against the standard of care.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 582
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is the main cause of death among hospitalised people living with HIV. Non-sputum-based diagnostics could improve patient outcomes. The EXULTANT trial aims to evaluate an expanded tuberculosis screening strategy among people with HIV in two African countries with a high tuberculosis and HIV burden. METHODS: This pragmatic, individually randomised controlled superiority trial was conducted across 11 hospitals in Tanzania and Mozambique. We consecutively enrolled adults living with HIV (aged ≥18 years) without an existing tuberculosis diagnosis or recent tuberculosis treatment, within 24 h of admission. The intervention group underwent Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) testing from sputum, stool, and urine, plus lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) testing (Determine TB LAM Ag assay), irrespective of symptoms. The control group followed standard-of-care, symptom-based, WHO-recommended sputum Xpert Ultra and LF-LAM testing. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis starting treatment within 72 h. Secondary endpoints included 8-week all-cause mortality and time to tuberculosis diagnosis. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04568967) and is completed. FINDINGS: From Sept 25, 2022, to March 15, 2024, we screened 1534 participants, and randomly assigned 1172 (76·6%) to either the intervention group (n=582) or the control group (n=590). At admission, 715 participants (61·0%) were female, 845 (75·4%) were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), and median CD4 count was 232 cells per μL (IQR 87-490). In the control group, 505 (85·6%) had tuberculosis-compatible symptoms and were eligible for sputum Xpert Ultra testing (306 of them [60·6%] provided a sample) and 538 (91·2%) met WHO criteria for LF-LAM testing. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 93 (16·0%) of 582 participants in the intervention group and 90 (15·3%) of 590 in the control group had microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis and started treatment within 72 h (difference 0·7%, 95% CI -3·4 to 4·8, p=0·73). 8-week all-cause mortality was 25·8% (150 of 582) in the intervention group and 28·8% (170 of 590) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·86, 95% CI 0·69 to 1·07, p=0·18). Median time to tuberculosis treatment initiation was 0·98 days (IQR 0·83-1·92) and 0·92 days (0·79-1·86) in the intervention and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio 1·05, 95% CI 0·82 to 1·33, p=0·72). INTERPRETATION: An expanded screening strategy among people living with HIV admitted to hospital did not increase the proportion of individuals with microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis starting treatment or reduce 8-week mortality. FUNDING: EDCTP2 programme, supported by the EU.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.