Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis finds higher TB prevalence among people living with HIV in AfricaTB’s Hidden Link: Why HIV Changes the Risk Picture

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Recognize higher tuberculosis prevalence among people living with HIV in Southern and Eastern Africa based on meta-analysis.

This publication is a systematic review and meta-analysis examining tuberculosis prevalence and notification-to-prevalence ratios among people living with and without HIV in low- and middle-income countries. The analysis included 264,530 participants across Southern and Eastern Africa settings. The primary outcome focused on bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis prevalence, while secondary outcomes assessed notification-to-prevalence ratios.

Key findings indicate that bacteriologically-confirmed tuberculosis prevalence was higher among participants living with versus without HIV in 11 of 12 surveys. The pooled effect size showed a relative risk of 3.86, with a 95% credible interval of 2.41-5.53. Regarding notification-to-prevalence ratios, results were higher among participants living with HIV in all examined countries, yielding a relative risk of 1.74 (95% credible interval: 0.59-4.56). Conversely, ratios were lower among participants without HIV, with a relative risk of 0.48 (95% credible interval: 0.17-1.20).

The authors acknowledge limitations, specifically noting limited information on how tuberculosis prevalence differs between people living with and without HIV. They also caution against overstatement of the precision of the notification-to-prevalence ratio estimates given the wide credible intervals. The review does not report adverse events or causality notes.

Practice relevance is not reported in this source. Clinicians should interpret these associations carefully without inferring causation from the observed data. The findings highlight the burden of tuberculosis in this specific population but require cautious application due to the noted limitations and observational nature of the underlying surveys.

The Twin Threats

Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV are two of the deadliest infectious diseases on the planet. They hit hardest in low- and middle-income countries, where resources are already stretched thin.

For decades, doctors have known these two infections are linked. But the exact size of that risk has been murky. That uncertainty makes it harder to prioritize testing and treatment where it’s needed most.

TB is a bacterial infection that usually attacks the lungs. It spreads through the air when someone coughs or sneezes. Without treatment, it can be fatal.

HIV weakens the immune system, leaving the body vulnerable to infections it would normally fight off. TB is one of the most common and dangerous opportunistic infections for people living with HIV.

Current guidelines recommend frequent TB screening for people with HIV. But in many places, testing is limited or delayed. This study aimed to pin down exactly how much higher the risk is—and what that means for public health efforts.

We used to talk about the link between TB and HIV in general terms. We knew they were “related,” but we didn’t have a clear, pooled number showing the true gap in risk.

This new analysis changes that. It combines data from 12 large surveys across nine African countries. It gives us a hard number for the difference in TB prevalence between people with and without HIV.

The result is a stark reminder of how much work remains.

How the Immune System’s “Security Guard” Gets Overwhelmed

Think of your immune system as a security team for your body. Its job is to spot intruders—like the TB bacteria—and lock them down before they cause trouble.

HIV attacks the very cells that lead this security team. As the HIV virus weakens these cells, the body’s ability to contain the TB bacteria drops.

It’s like a castle with its walls crumbling. The TB bacteria, which might have been dormant in a corner, can now break out and start a full-scale invasion. That’s why the risk of active, contagious TB skyrockets.

Researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. They looked at TB prevalence surveys published between January 1993 and October 2025.

They focused on low- and middle-income countries. The final analysis included 12 surveys from nine countries in Southern and Eastern Africa. In total, they looked at data from over 264,000 participants.

The goal was to compare the rates of bacteriologically-confirmed TB in people living with HIV versus those without.

The Numbers Behind the Risk

The findings were striking. In 11 of the 12 surveys, TB prevalence was higher in people living with HIV.

The overall pooled risk ratio was 3.86. In plain English, this means people living with HIV were nearly four times more likely to have active TB than those without HIV. The data suggests the true risk could be as high as six times greater.

This is a massive difference. It shows that HIV doesn’t just slightly increase TB risk—it multiplies it.

The Diagnosis Gap

The researchers also looked at something called the notification-to-prevalence (N:P) ratio. This compares the number of people diagnosed with TB to the actual number of people who have it.

A higher ratio means more cases are being found and treated.

For people living with HIV, the N:P ratio was 1.74. For people without HIV, it was just 0.48.

This suggests that health systems are doing a better job finding and diagnosing TB in people with HIV. But the ratios also reveal a troubling reality: for both groups, many people with TB are still going undiagnosed and untreated.

This doesn’t mean the problem is solved.

A Clearer Target for Action

Experts say this data provides a powerful tool for public health. By quantifying the risk, it makes the case for stronger screening programs in HIV clinics.

It also highlights that even with better screening for people with HIV, the overall system for finding TB cases is still failing too many people. The focus needs to be on both targeted screening and broader public health efforts.

If you are living with HIV, this study reinforces a critical message: you need to be vigilant about TB.

Talk to your doctor about regular TB screening. Don’t ignore symptoms like a persistent cough, fever, or unexplained weight loss. Early detection is key to successful treatment.

For everyone else, this is a reminder that diseases rarely act alone. Understanding these connections helps build stronger, more effective health systems.

This study is a meta-analysis, meaning it looks back at existing data to find a pattern. It doesn’t test a new drug or intervention.

The next step is to use this information to improve testing and treatment on the ground. Researchers and health officials will need to figure out how to close the diagnosis gap for both people with and without HIV.

It’s a call to action: find the missing cases, and save the lives that hang in the balance.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 264,530
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are leading causes of infectious disease deaths, with disproportionate impact in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite well-established biological relationships between these diseases, there is limited information on how TB prevalence differs between people living with and without HIV. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of TB prevalence surveys conducted in LMICs and published during January 1st 1993-October 13th 2025 (PROSPERO CRD42024503853). We extracted bacteriologically-confirmed TB prevalence estimates stratified by participant HIV status. Surveys that offered HIV testing to all, sputum-collection-eligible, or TB-positive participants were included in the primary analysis. We applied Bayesian meta-regression to estimate pooled risk ratios (RR) of bacteriologically-confirmed TB prevalence among participants living with versus without HIV. Additionally, we estimated country-level and overall TB notification-to-prevalence (N:P) ratios by HIV status. Findings: Of 10,211 potentially relevant publications, 12 TB prevalence surveys--representing 264,530 participants within nine countries in Southern and Eastern Africa--were used in the primary analysis. Reported TB prevalence was higher among participants living with versus without HIV in 11/12 surveys, with an overall pooled RR of 3.86 (95% credible interval: 2.41-5.53). N:P ratios were higher among participants living with HIV in all examined countries. The overall pooled N:P ratios were 1.74 (0.59-4.56) and 0.48 (0.17-1.20) among participants living with versus without HIV, respectively. Interpretation: In Southern and Eastern Africa, bacteriologically-confirmed TB prevalence is three- to six-times higher among people living with HIV. Comparison of prevalence and notification data suggest higher rates of TB diagnosis for people living with versus without HIV, but also indicates substantial delays in the detection of untreated TB cases for both populations. Funding: Wellcome Trust, UK National Institute for Health and Care Research, UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, NIH.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.