Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Target trial emulation in Johannesburg shows dolutegravir associated with greater weight and blood pressure increases versus efavirenz

Target trial emulation in Johannesburg shows dolutegravir associated with greater weight and blood p…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that dolutegravir initiation is associated with greater weight and blood pressure increases versus efavirenz in this South African cohort.

This target trial emulation evaluated treatment-naive individuals in Johannesburg, South Africa. The study compared initiation of dolutegravir with initiation of efavirenz. The population consisted of 2930 participants followed for 24.0 months. No specific safety data or discontinuation rates were reported in the input.

Regarding weight, the mean difference was 2.9 kg at 12-months and 1.9 kg at 24-months favoring dolutegravir. The 95% CI for weight at 12-months was -0.3, 5.5 and at 24-months was -1.3, 5.1. For BMI, the mean difference was 0.8 kg/m at 12-months and 0.6 kg/m at 24-months. The 95% CI for BMI at 12-months was -0.3, 1.9 and at 24-months was -0.6, 1.9.

Blood pressure changes showed a mean difference of 3.9 mmHg for systolic BP at 12-months and 1.7 mmHg at 24-months. The 95% CI for systolic BP at 12-months was 1.2, 6.6 and at 24-months was -1.8, 5.1. Diastolic BP showed a mean difference of 1.6 mmHg at 12-months and -0.4 mmHg at 24-months. The 95% CI for diastolic BP at 12-months was -0.7, 3.9 and at 24-months was -1.8, 5.1. Incident hypertension risk rose by 35% at 12-months and 22% at 24-months. The 95% CI for incident hypertension at 12-months was 0.04, 0.5 and at 24-months was -0.1, 0.4.

A key limitation is that future research is needed to determine whether this reflects a direct effect of dolutegravir or the weight-suppressing effects of efavirenz. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up24.0 mo
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: Using the Target Trial Emulation Framework, we evaluated the impact of initiating dolutegravir versus efavirenz on 12- and 24-month weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), and incident hypertension among treatment-naïve individuals in Johannesburg, South Africa from 2019 to 2022. METHODS: We used linear models to estimate the mean difference in weight, BMI, BP and a log-binomial model to estimate the causal risk difference of incident hypertension, adjusting for patient characteristics via inverse probability weighting. RESULTS: Among 2930 people initiating treatment from 2019 to 2022, 1847 initiated dolutegravir and 1083 initiated efavirenz. At 12-months, mean difference comparing dolutegravir to efavirenz in weight was 2.9 kg (95% Confidence Interval (CI): -0.3, 5.5), BMI was 0.8 kg/m (95% CI: -0.3, 1.9), diastolic BP was 1.6 mmHg (95% CI: -0.7, 3.9) and systolic BP was 3.9 mmHg (95% CI: 1.2, 6.6). Risk of incident hypertension rose by 35% (95% CI: 0.04, 0.5). At 24-months, mean weight difference was 1.9 kg (95% CI: -1.3, 5.1), BMI was 0.6 kg/m (95% CI: -0.6, 1.9), diastolic BP was -0.4 mmHg (95% CI: -1.8, 5.1) and systolic BP was 1.7 mmHg (95% CI: -1.8, 5.1). Risk of incident hypertension rose by 22% (95% CI: -0.1, 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Dolutegravir was associated with greater increases in weight, systolic BP, and incident hypertension over 24-months, particularly in the first 12-months. Future research is needed to determine whether this reflects a direct effect of dolutegravir or the weight-suppressing effects of efavirenz.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.