Direct Transfer to Angiography Suite Shows No Benefit, Higher Hemorrhage Risk in Severe Stroke
This multicenter randomized controlled trial at ten comprehensive stroke centers in France enrolled 115 adult patients (age ≤85 years) with acute severe neurological deficit highly suggestive of ischemic stroke from large vessel occlusion, admitted within 5 hours of symptom onset. Patients were assigned to either direct transfer to the angiography suite (DTAS, n=57) or the conventional pathway of imaging followed by transfer for endovascular treatment if eligible (n=58).
The primary outcome of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2) at 90 days showed no significant difference between groups: 20 of 56 patients (36%) in the DTAS group versus 22 of 53 (42%) in the conventional group (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.32-1.69). All-cause mortality at 90 days also did not differ significantly (18% vs 11%; adjusted OR 1.65, 95% CI 0.52-5.55). A key safety finding was a significantly increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage with DTAS (5 of 34 patients [15%] vs 0 of 42 [0%]; adjusted OR 11.0, 95% CI 1.28-1406).
Major limitations include the trial being stopped early for safety reasons and a small sample size that limits the precision of effect estimates for both the primary outcome and safety outcomes. Safety and tolerability details such as adverse events and discontinuations were not reported. The study was funded by the French Ministry of Health and Medtronic.
Given the lack of functional benefit, the concerning safety signal for hemorrhage, and the early trial termination, the direct transfer to angiography suite strategy cannot be recommended over conventional imaging-first pathways based on this evidence. Further clinical trials are required to firmly establish the safety and efficacy of this approach.