Pilot RCT assesses feasibility of comparing propofol vs. sevoflurane anesthesia for stroke thrombectomy
This pilot randomized controlled trial assessed the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial comparing anesthetic agents for endovascular thrombectomy. The study enrolled 93 of 201 eligible patients (46.3%) with acute ischemic stroke, with 73 included in the final analysis. Patients were randomized to receive either sevoflurane-based or propofol-based general anesthesia during the procedure. The primary outcomes were feasibility metrics, including recruitment rate, protocol adherence (94.5%), and data completion rate (99%).
Secondary clinical outcomes, including 90-day functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and mortality, showed no statistically significant differences between the two anesthetic groups. The study was not powered to detect clinical differences. An exploratory analysis found that higher admission NIH Stroke Scale scores were associated with mortality, and higher systolic blood pressures both pre-reperfusion (r=0.32, P<0.01) and post-reperfusion (r=0.27, P=0.03) were associated with worse 90-day modified Rankin scores.
Safety and tolerability data for the anesthetic agents were not reported. A key limitation was that the consent and randomization model presented challenges in the acute stroke setting. The authors note that future definitive studies would benefit from a trial design better integrated into clinical workflow. This was a feasibility study; no causal conclusions about the effect of anesthetic choice on clinical outcomes can be drawn from these preliminary data.