Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Post hoc analysis finds cilostazol reduces stroke recurrence without lowering systolic blood pressureStudy finds cilostazol reduces stroke recurrence without lowering blood pressure

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that cilostazol may reduce stroke recurrence independent of blood pressure effects, but this comes from post hoc analysis.

This post hoc mediation analysis examined data from an RCT involving 1,795 patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. Patients received either dual therapy with cilostazol plus aspirin or clopidogrel (n=889) or monotherapy with aspirin or clopidogrel alone (n=906), with a median follow-up of 1.4 years (16.8 months). The primary outcome was first recurrence of ischemic stroke.

The analysis found that first stroke recurrence occurred in 27 of 889 patients (3%) in the dual therapy group compared to 62 of 906 patients (6.8%) in the monotherapy group. Mediation analysis suggested the effect was not mediated by systolic blood pressure reduction, with a direct cumulative hazard rate difference of -0.043 (95% CI: -0.070 to -0.015) and a negligible indirect effect through systolic blood pressure of -0.0008 (95% CI: -0.0024 to 0.00035).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in this analysis. The primary limitation is that this was a post hoc analysis, which carries inherent methodological constraints and should be considered hypothesis-generating rather than definitive. Mediation analyses have specific assumptions and limitations regarding causal inference.

For clinical practice, these findings suggest cilostazol may reduce stroke recurrence through mechanisms independent of systolic blood pressure lowering. However, clinicians should interpret these results with caution due to the post hoc nature of the analysis and the absence of reported safety data. The results require validation in prospective studies designed specifically to test this hypothesis.

Researchers wanted to understand how a medication called cilostazol helps prevent strokes from happening again. They looked at patients who had already experienced a noncardioembolic ischemic stroke, which is a type of stroke not caused by a heart clot. The study involved 889 patients taking cilostazol plus another blood thinner and 906 patients taking only one blood thinner.

The main finding was that patients taking cilostazol had fewer repeat strokes. About 3% of patients on the dual therapy had another stroke, compared to about 6.8% of patients on single therapy. The analysis specifically showed that this benefit did not appear to work by lowering systolic blood pressure, which is the top number in a blood pressure reading.

It is important to know this was a post hoc analysis. This means researchers went back and looked at data from a previous study that was designed to answer a different question. While the results are interesting, they need to be confirmed by studies specifically designed to test this idea. The analysis did not report on side effects or safety concerns from adding cilostazol.

Readers should understand this research helps explain how an existing medication might work, but it does not change current medical practice. The finding suggests cilostazol's benefit for preventing another stroke may come from a mechanism other than blood pressure control. More research is needed to fully understand this process.

What this means for you:
Cilostazol may prevent repeat strokes through a mechanism not related to blood pressure, but this finding needs confirmation.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 889
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up16.8 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIM: Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, reduces the risk of stroke recurrence among patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke through inhibition of the platelet function and its pleiotropic effects. Its potential mechanisms include inhibiting angiotensin II-induced endothelial cell apoptosis and promoting vasodilation, which may lower systolic blood pressure (SBP). We hypothesized that the decreased risk of stroke recurrence could be attributed to a reduction in SBP. METHODS: In a post hoc analysis of CSPS.com, we defined change in SBP as its change at the last visit compared with baseline and treated it as a time-dependent mediator. We performed causal mediation analyses to separate the overall effects of cilostazol on the first recurrence of ischemic stroke into indirect effects (mediated by change in SBP on cilostazol) and direct effects (mediated through pathways other than a change in SBP on cilostazol). The effects were summarized by cumulative hazard rate difference. RESULTS: Ischemic stroke recurred in 27 (3%) of 889 patients on dual therapy with cilostazol and aspirin or clopidogrel and 62 (6.8%) of 906 patients on monotherapy with aspirin or clopidogrel alone during a median follow-up period of 1.4 years. The mediation analysis showed that the positive effect of dual therapy was not mediated by the association between SBP change and stroke recurrence. The estimated direct and indirect effects of cilostazol on stroke recurrence during the same follow-up period were cumulative hazard rate differences of -0.043 (95% CI, -0.070 to -0.015) and -0.0008 (-0.0024 to 0.00035), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that cilostazol reduced stroke recurrence without lowering SBP, likely through other pleiotropic pathways.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.