Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Bariatric surgery yields greater long-term weight loss than GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with obesity

Bariatric surgery yields greater long-term weight loss than GLP-1 receptor agonists in adults with…
Photo by David Clarke / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider bariatric surgery for sustained weight loss advantages over GLP-1 agonists in obesity.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated bariatric surgery versus GLP-1 receptor agonists for adults with obesity. The primary focus was on changes in body mass index and weight over varying durations. Secondary outcomes included glycaemic indices, lipid profiles, and blood pressure.

At six months, weight loss did not differ significantly between the two approaches. However, by one year and beyond, the data favored bariatric surgery for greater reductions in weight and BMI. Glycaemic control also improved more substantially with surgery beyond the one-year mark.

No significant differences were observed for serum lipids or blood pressure between the groups. The authors highlight substantial heterogeneity across the included studies as a key limitation. This variability suggests caution when generalizing results to all clinical settings.

The practice relevance supports the use of bariatric surgery in appropriately selected adults with obesity, particularly for sustained long-term outcomes. Clinicians should weigh the initial equivalence against the superior durability of surgical intervention.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 594
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The comparative effectiveness of bariatric surgery (BS) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for weight loss among patients with obesity remains uncertain. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched to 5 October 2025. Pooled mean differences (MDs) for change in weight, body mass index (BMI), glycaemic indices, lipid profile and blood pressure were calculated using random-effects models with heterogeneity quantified by I. Outcomes were assessed separately according to time duration. Meta-regression was performed for the primary outcome of change in BMI. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (20 594 participants) were included. Weight loss did not differ significantly at 6 months (MD -12.19 kg; p = 0.13), but favoured BS at ≤ 1 year (MD -16.97 kg; p = 0.02) and > 1 year (MD -19.78 kg; p < 0.001). BMI reduction consistently favoured BS at 6 months (MD -6.77 kg/m; p = 0.02), ≤ 1 year (MD -5.10 kg/m; p < 0.001) and > 1 year (MD -6.61 kg/m; p < 0.001). HbA1c reduction was greater with BS beyond one year (MD -1.69%; p < 0.001), and fasting glucose was lower overall with BS (MD -1.22 mmol/L; p = 0.03). Serum lipids and blood pressure showed no significant between-group differences. Meta-regression demonstrated larger BMI reductions with BS in older patients, male patients and those with higher baseline BMI. CONCLUSION: Although substantial heterogeneity was present, BS was associated with greater and sustained reductions observed over multi-year follow up in weight, BMI and glycaemic indices compared to GLP-1 RAs, with similar effects on serum lipids and blood pressure, supporting its use in appropriately selected adults with obesity.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.