Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Trastuzumab deruxtecan improves PFS vs chemotherapy in HR-positive, HER2-low breast cancerTrial shows T-DXd beats chemo for breast cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider T-DXd as a broadly efficacious option for HR-positive, HER2-low/-ultralow mBC after endocrine therapy, though subgroup results are post hoc.

This phase 3 RCT enrolled 866 patients with HR-positive, HER2-low/-ultralow metastatic breast cancer who had received one or more prior endocrine therapies. Patients were randomized to trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) 5.4 mg/kg every 3 weeks or physician's choice chemotherapy (TPC). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review.

In post hoc subgroup analyses by time to progression (TTP) on prior first-line endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6 inhibitor, T-DXd improved median PFS across all subgroups. For TTP <6 months, median PFS was 14.0 vs 6.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-15.9 vs 4.2-8.4). For TTP 6-12 months, median PFS was 13.2 vs 6.9 months (95% CI: 8.6-16.4 vs 4.3-10.4). For TTP >12 months, median PFS was 12.9 vs 8.2 months (95% CI: 9.8-17.1 vs 6.9-10.9). Objective response rates ranged from 36.7% to 67.7% with T-DXd versus 16.7% to 37.5% with TPC. Duration of response and time to second progression (PFS2) also favored T-DXd.

Safety profiles were consistent with the overall safety population; no new safety signals were reported. These subgroup analyses are post hoc and should be interpreted cautiously. Nonetheless, the data support T-DXd as a broadly efficacious treatment for this patient population regardless of TTP, endocrine resistance, or disease burden.

A large phase 3 trial tested a targeted drug called trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) against standard chemotherapy in 866 people with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-low or HER2-ultralow metastatic breast cancer. All participants had already tried at least one hormone therapy.

The study found that T-DXd delayed cancer growth by several months compared to chemotherapy. For example, in people whose cancer had progressed quickly on previous treatment, the median time before the cancer worsened was 14 months with T-DXd versus 6.5 months with chemo. Similar benefits were seen in other groups. The drug also led to higher response rates and longer-lasting responses.

Safety information was not detailed in this report, but the researchers noted that side effects were similar to what has been seen before with these treatments. No serious adverse events or discontinuation rates were reported.

It is important to know that these results come from a subgroup analysis, which means the researchers looked at specific groups after the main study was done. This type of analysis is less reliable than the main findings. Still, the overall trial was a randomized controlled trial, which is a strong study design. These findings suggest T-DXd may be a good option for many people with this type of breast cancer, but more research is needed to confirm the results in these subgroups.

What this means for you:
T-DXd may offer better cancer control than chemo for some people with advanced breast cancer, but results are preliminary.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 866
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up0.7 mo
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: In DESTINY-Breast06, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus physician's choice of chemotherapy (TPC) for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low/-ultralow metastatic breast cancer (mBC), without new safety signals. We report additional analyses exploring outcomes for patients with characteristics that affect prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive T-DXd (5.4 mg/kg) once every 3 weeks or TPC. Subgroups were specified post hoc from the intent-to-treat population (N = 866). Outcomes were PFS, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) by blinded independent central review via RECIST 1.1. Time from randomization until second progression or death (PFS2) by investigator and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Within subgroups, baseline disease characteristics and prior therapies were balanced across treatments. Median PFS (95% confidence interval) favored T-DXd versus TPC regardless of time to progression (TTP) on prior first-line endocrine therapy (ET) + cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i): <6 months: 14.0 (11.2-15.9) versus 6.5 (4.2-8.4) months for T-DXd versus TPC; 6-12 months: 13.2 (8.6-16.4) versus 6.9 (4.3-10.4) months; >12 months: 12.9 (9.8-17.1) versus 8.2 (6.9-10.9) months. A consistent PFS benefit with T-DXd over TPC was observed for patients with primary or secondary endocrine resistance, and across indicators of high or low disease burden (defined as visceral/non-visceral disease, presence/absence of liver metastases, three or more/less than three disease sites, and >median/≤median baseline tumor size). In all subgroups, confirmed ORR favored T-DXd (36.7% to 67.7%) versus TPC (16.7% to 37.5%), and median DOR (confirmed response) was longer with T-DXd. T-DXd also prolonged PFS2 versus TPC across subgroups. Safety profiles of T-DXd and TPC in subgroups were consistent with the overall safety population. CONCLUSIONS: These data support T-DXd as a broadly efficacious treatment for patients with HR-positive, HER2-low/-ultralow mBC after one or more ETs, regardless of TTP on prior first-line ET + CDK4/6i, endocrine resistance, or disease burden.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.