Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

FNAC using WHO reporting system shows 87.01% diagnostic accuracy for breast lesions in women aged 40Fine needle tests show high accuracy for young women's breast lesions

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that FNAC with the WHO reporting system provides high specificity (97.53%) for identifying malignant breast lesions.

This meta-analysis synthesizes data from five studies involving 245 FNAC procedures to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the WHO reporting system for breast lesions in women aged 40 and under. The analysis provides a pooled sensitivity of 81.33% and a pooled specificity of 97.53%, resulting in an overall diagnostic accuracy of 87.01%.

The Risk of Malignancy (ROM) varies significantly by category: the malignant category showed 100% ROM, while the suspicious for malignancy category showed 93.3% ROM. The benign category had a lower ROM of 3.3% to 4.0%, and the inadequate/unsatisfactory category showed 66.7%.

The authors note significant limitations, including substantial spectrum bias as three of five studies included only histologically confirmed malignant cases, meaning true negatives were zero in those instances. Additionally, pooled specificity and NPV are based on only two studies with mixed benign and malignant cases. Despite these limitations, the high specificity and PPV suggest that malignant or suspicious diagnoses in this age group are highly reliable and require urgent management.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in evaluating diagnostic accuracy for breast lesions specifically in younger women (aged 40 and under). While it does not directly relate to the previously covered topics of surgical techniques, survival rates in Ghana, or systemic therapies like ICIs, it provides specific data on the reliability of FNAC using the WHO reporting system as a diagnostic tool.

When a woman under 40 finds a lump or lesion in her breast, the first step is often a fine needle aspiration (FNAC). This procedure uses a thin needle to collect cells for testing. Because of the high stakes involved with potential cancer, doctors need tools that provide clear, reliable answers quickly.

A review of 245 procedures showed that this test is highly accurate at identifying cancer in younger women. Specifically, the test had an overall accuracy of about 87 percent. For cases labeled as malignant or suspicious for malignancy, the reliability was very high, reaching up to 100 percent. This means when the test flags a concern, doctors can act urgently.

However, there are some nuances to keep in mind. The test had a lower sensitivity of about 81 percent, which means it might not catch every single case perfectly. Additionally, because some studies only looked at known cancer cases, the data on how well it rules out cancer is limited. These results help confirm that while the tool is very reliable for identifying risks, it works best when interpreted carefully by a medical team.

What this means for you:
Fine needle tests are highly reliable at identifying suspicious breast lesions in women under 40.

Common questions

How accurate is a fine needle aspiration for women under 40?

The test showed an overall diagnostic accuracy of 87.01 percent in women aged 40 and under. For cases labeled as malignant or suspicious, the reliability was very high, reaching up to 100 percent.

What does a 'suspicious' result mean for my diagnosis?

A result in the 'suspicious for malignancy' category has a 93.3 percent risk of being cancer. Because these results are highly reliable, they usually require urgent management from your doctor.

Are there any limitations to this testing method?

The test had a lower sensitivity of 81.33 percent and some data on ruling out cancer was limited because only two studies included both benign and malignant cases. Talk to your doctor about what these numbers mean for your specific situation.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 20
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer deaths among women worldwide. Diagnostic vigilance is vital as malignant cases in young women show higher proliferation and lower hormone-regulated gene expression, indicating more aggressive cases. The proposed IAC-IARC-WHO reporting system will adopt and update the current IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast cytology, which has five categories. This review evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in women aged ≤ 40 using the WHO reporting system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Studies were identified, screened, and assessed; data extracted, quality evaluated, and information synthesized based on predefined criteria. We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus using Boolean operators for keywords up to December 2025. Eligible observational and case series studies with at least 20 participants were included. Study quality was assessed with QUADAS-3 to evaluate bias and applicability. Diagnostic categories were assigned to the WHO Reporting System for analysis and ROM calculation by consensus. RESULTS: Five studies with 245 FNAC procedures in women ≤ 40 years, 231 confirmed histopathologically. Pooled sensitivity was 81.33%, specificity 97.53%, and diagnostic accuracy 87.01%. The risk of malignancy (ROM) by WHO reporting system category ranged from 3.3% to 4.0% in the Benign category, reached 93.3% in the Suspicious for Malignancy category, and 100% in the Malignant category. The inadequate/unsatisfactory category showed a high ROM of 66.7%. These estimates are subject to significant spectrum bias because three of the five included studies enrolled only histologically confirmed malignant cases (true negatives = 0). Consequently, pooled specificity and NPV are based on only two studies with mixed benign and malignant cases. CONCLUSION: The present systematic review shows the high specificity and PPV, indicating that malignant or suspicious diagnoses in women aged 40 and under are highly reliable and need urgent management. Slightly lower sensitivity and NPV in this group highlight diagnostic challenges. ROM analysis confirms the WHO Reporting System's prognostic value: benign results have low ROM, while insufficient/inadequate, Atypical, SM, and Malignant categories have high ROM.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.