Systematic review of induction methods for pelvic inflammatory disease animal models
This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of current advances in the construction of animal models for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). The scope of the review encompasses the analysis of integrated induction strategies and a comparison of the strengths, limitations, and applicable scenarios for different modeling methods.
The authors categorize induction methods into three primary types. Pathogen induction utilizes single or multiple microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, to recapitulate infectious etiology. Chemical induction employs agents like phenol mucilage, hydrochloric acid combined with lipopolysaccharide, and exogenous estrogen to simulate inflammatory processes through direct tissue damage or immune modulation. Physical induction includes mechanical injury to disrupt mucosal barriers and foreign body implantation to mimic intrauterine device-related chronic inflammation.
Despite the variety of available methods, the authors identify significant limitations in the current landscape of PID modeling. These include a lack of standardized protocols, insufficient characterization of chronic disease progression, and limited translational relevance to human disease.
These models serve as tools to investigate PID pathogenesis, evaluate potential therapies, and develop diagnostic strategies. However, clinicians should interpret the findings of these models with caution due to the identified gaps in standardization and human translation.