Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review of induction methods for pelvic inflammatory disease animal models

Systematic review of induction methods for pelvic inflammatory disease animal models
Photo by iMattSmart / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that current PID animal models face limitations in standardization and translational relevance to human disease.

This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of current advances in the construction of animal models for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). The scope of the review encompasses the analysis of integrated induction strategies and a comparison of the strengths, limitations, and applicable scenarios for different modeling methods.

The authors categorize induction methods into three primary types. Pathogen induction utilizes single or multiple microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum, to recapitulate infectious etiology. Chemical induction employs agents like phenol mucilage, hydrochloric acid combined with lipopolysaccharide, and exogenous estrogen to simulate inflammatory processes through direct tissue damage or immune modulation. Physical induction includes mechanical injury to disrupt mucosal barriers and foreign body implantation to mimic intrauterine device-related chronic inflammation.

Despite the variety of available methods, the authors identify significant limitations in the current landscape of PID modeling. These include a lack of standardized protocols, insufficient characterization of chronic disease progression, and limited translational relevance to human disease.

These models serve as tools to investigate PID pathogenesis, evaluate potential therapies, and develop diagnostic strategies. However, clinicians should interpret the findings of these models with caution due to the identified gaps in standardization and human translation.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a complex multifactorial infectious disorder of the female reproductive tract, associated with severe long-term sequelae including infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain, as well as elevated risks of endometriosis, cardiometabolic diseases, and colorectal cancer. Owing to ethical constraints on human research, animal models have become indispensable tools for investigating PID pathogenesis, evaluating therapeutic interventions, and developing novel diagnostic strategies. This review systematically summarizes current advances in PID animal model construction, with a focus on three core induction categories: pathogen, chemical, and physical induction methods. Pathogen induction utilizes single or multiple microorganisms (including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum) to recapitulate the infectious etiology of clinical PID. Chemical induction employs agents such as phenol mucilage, hydrochloric acid combined with lipopolysaccharide, and exogenous estrogen to simulate inflammatory processes via direct tissue damage or immune modulation. Physical induction methods include mechanical injury to disrupt mucosal barriers and foreign body implantation to mimic intrauterine device-related chronic inflammation. We further analyze integrated induction strategies that combine multiple approaches to improve model stability and pathological fidelity, and compare the strengths, limitations, and applicable scenarios of each modeling method. Finally, we discuss current gaps in PID animal model research, including the lack of standardized protocols, insufficient characterization of chronic disease progression, and limited translational relevance to human disease, and propose priorities for future model development to support preclinical research on PID prevention and treatment.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.