Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Nurse and social worker telecare team intervention improved quality of life in high-risk patients with COPD, heart failure, or interstitial lung diseaseTelecare Team Helps Heart And Lung Patients Feel Better For Less Cost

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider the ADAPT telecare team intervention for high-risk patients with COPD, heart failure, or interstitial lung disease.

This randomized clinical trial examined the content, processes, and cost of delivering the ADAPT intervention among 153 high-risk patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, or interstitial lung disease. The setting was multisite. The primary outcomes included quality of life, disease-specific health status, depression, and anxiety. Secondary outcomes included intervention session frequency and duration, team recommendations, and per-patient cost.

The mean length of intervention was 115.1 days with a standard deviation of 33.4 days. Participants averaged 10.0 sessions with a nurse (SD 3.3) and 9.5 sessions with a social worker (SD 3.4). Completion of required social work sessions occurred in 80.4% of cases. All required nurse sessions were completed. Team discussions averaged 3.7 times per participant (SD 1.8). Participants received an average of 7 recommendations per participant (SD 3.8). Referrals or consults occurred in 79.7% of cases. Medication additions occurred in 58.1% of cases, medication changes in 31.8%, and tests in 33.1%.

The mean cost per patient was $1139.68 with a standard deviation of $368.15. Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. The study limitations were not reported. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. The practice relevance indicates that the intervention produced clinically meaningful changes in multiple quality of life outcomes for a relatively low cost.

Imagine waking up with shortness of breath that makes getting out of bed feel like climbing a mountain. Now picture having a friendly voice on the phone every few days to help you breathe easier and feel less worried. This is the reality for many people living with serious heart or lung problems.

They often face a lonely battle against their illness without enough support from their usual doctors. Current treatments focus heavily on medicine but often miss the emotional and practical struggles that make daily life hard. Patients need more than just pills to manage their condition effectively.

But here is the twist. A new approach using phone calls from a nurse and a social worker changed the game for these patients. This team did not replace doctors but worked alongside them to fill the gaps in care. They focused on the whole person not just the disease.

Think of the body like a busy factory where machines break down and need repair. The medicine fixes the broken parts but the workers need rest and good tools to keep running. The telecare team acted as the maintenance crew bringing fresh supplies and fixing problems before they caused a shutdown. They helped patients manage stress and sleep which are vital for recovery.

The study looked at 153 people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease heart failure or interstitial lung disease. These participants received calls from a nurse and a social worker over a period of about four months. The team discussed each person an average of four times and made seven recommendations per patient.

Most recommendations involved connecting patients with other specialists like mental health experts or physical therapists. The team also suggested changing medications or ordering new tests when needed. Eighty percent of participants finished all their required sessions with the social worker and the nurse.

The results showed clear improvements in how patients felt and lived their daily lives. Depression and anxiety scores dropped significantly while overall health status improved. Patients reported feeling more in control of their condition and less afraid of their symptoms.

This doesn't mean this treatment is available yet. The study showed promise but real world rollout takes time. The average cost to deliver this care was about $1,140 per patient. This is a small price to pay for better mental health and quality of life.

Experts say this model fits well into modern healthcare systems. It uses existing resources like community programs and specialist referrals rather than creating new expensive services. The high completion rate suggests patients found the support helpful and easy to use.

What does this mean for you or a loved one. If you struggle with heart or lung disease talk to your doctor about support services. Ask if a nurse or social worker can join your care team via phone or video. These professionals can help you navigate the healthcare system and find community resources.

The study had some limitations like the small number of participants and the specific type of intervention used. Not every hospital has the staff to run this program right now. Researchers are working to expand this model to more places.

The road ahead involves testing this approach in larger groups and different settings. If successful it could become a standard part of care for many chronic conditions. More research will determine the best ways to train staff and manage costs.

7. ENDING

More trials will follow to see if this model works for other diseases and populations. Researchers will also look at ways to make the program even more efficient. The goal is to bring this kind of compassionate support to more patients who need it.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 153
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
CONTEXT: In a multisite randomized clinical trial, a nurse and social worker telecare team intervention (ADAPT) improved quality of life, disease-specific health status, depression, and anxiety among high-risk patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, or interstitial lung disease. OBJECTIVES: Examine the content, processes, and cost of delivering the ADAPT intervention. METHODS: Analysis of prospectively collected data from the ADAPT randomized clinical trial, including intervention session frequency/duration, team recommendations, and per-patient cost to deliver the intervention using time-driven activity-based costing. RESULTS: Mean length of the intervention was 115.1 (SD 33.4) days. Participants (n = 153) averaged 10.0 (SD 3.3) sessions with the nurse and 9.5 (SD 3.4) sessions with the social worker; 80.4% completed all required social work sessions and all required nurse sessions. The team discussed each participant an average of 3.7 (SD 1.8) times and made 7 (SD 3.8) recommendations per participant. Common recommendations included referrals/consults (79.7%, e.g., mental health, sleep, PT/OT, other specialists), medication additions (58.1%) or changes (31.8%), and tests (33.1%). The mean cost to implement and deliver the intervention per patient was $1139.68 (SD $368.15). CONCLUSION: In a successful nurse and social work telecare team intervention, there was high participation in nurse and social worker sessions, individualized medical and behavioral interventions, and connecting of participants to existing medical and community resources. The intervention produced clinically meaningful changes in multiple quality of life outcomes for a relatively low cost.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.