This systematic review analyzed data from 2,315 children born preterm who received interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs after leaving the hospital. The research looked at how these programs affected various aspects of growth and daily life during infancy through adolescence. The findings indicate that these programs may offer small benefits for selective attention, behavioral problems, and parent-child interaction. However, the study found little to no effect on special educational needs, language skills, executive functioning, or the use of medical services. Some outcomes like quality of life and participation were not evaluated in the included studies. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate across different results, with many studies showing concerns or a high risk of bias. No safety issues were reported in the data provided. Readers should understand that while these programs might help with specific behavioral challenges, they do not appear to change educational requirements or language development significantly. The main reason to be cautious is that the overall evidence is not strong enough to guarantee results for every child. Families should consider these programs especially for children with additional medical or social risk factors, but expectations should be realistic regarding what the interventions can achieve.
Interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs may offer small benefits for selective attention and behavioral problems in preterm childrenEarly programs may help some preterm children but not all developmental areas
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs (EI) on children born preterm. The scope covered post-discharge settings with a sample size of 2,315 preterm born infants followed from infancy through adolescence. Most reported results showed some concerns or high risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate across outcomes. No included studies evaluated the effect of EI on ADHD, quality of life, or participation related to mobility or leisure activities.
Key findings indicated that EI may offer small benefits for selective attention, behavioral problems, and parent-child interaction. In contrast, little to no effect was found for special educational needs, language skills, executive functioning, and the use of medical services. Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported.
The authors suggest that EI may improve problems typically seen in preterm children and should be offered especially to those with additional medical or social risk factors. However, the limitations of the included studies and the low to moderate certainty of evidence require cautious interpretation of these results in clinical practice.