Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs may offer small benefits for selective attention and behavioral problems in preterm childrenEarly programs may help some preterm children but not all developmental areas

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider offering EI to preterm children with additional medical or social risk factors for small benefits in attention and behavior.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs (EI) on children born preterm. The scope covered post-discharge settings with a sample size of 2,315 preterm born infants followed from infancy through adolescence. Most reported results showed some concerns or high risk of bias, and the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate across outcomes. No included studies evaluated the effect of EI on ADHD, quality of life, or participation related to mobility or leisure activities.

Key findings indicated that EI may offer small benefits for selective attention, behavioral problems, and parent-child interaction. In contrast, little to no effect was found for special educational needs, language skills, executive functioning, and the use of medical services. Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported.

The authors suggest that EI may improve problems typically seen in preterm children and should be offered especially to those with additional medical or social risk factors. However, the limitations of the included studies and the low to moderate certainty of evidence require cautious interpretation of these results in clinical practice.

This systematic review analyzed data from 2,315 children born preterm who received interdisciplinary early developmental intervention programs after leaving the hospital. The research looked at how these programs affected various aspects of growth and daily life during infancy through adolescence. The findings indicate that these programs may offer small benefits for selective attention, behavioral problems, and parent-child interaction. However, the study found little to no effect on special educational needs, language skills, executive functioning, or the use of medical services. Some outcomes like quality of life and participation were not evaluated in the included studies. The certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to moderate across different results, with many studies showing concerns or a high risk of bias. No safety issues were reported in the data provided. Readers should understand that while these programs might help with specific behavioral challenges, they do not appear to change educational requirements or language development significantly. The main reason to be cautious is that the overall evidence is not strong enough to guarantee results for every child. Families should consider these programs especially for children with additional medical or social risk factors, but expectations should be realistic regarding what the interventions can achieve.

What this means for you:
Early programs may help attention and behavior in preterm children, but show little effect on language or school needs.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Aim: To systematically evaluate evidence on the effects of post-discharge early developmental intervention programs (EI) on behavioral development, quality of life, participation, executive functioning, parent-child interaction, and use of medical services from infancy through adolescence in children born preterm. Method: Four bibliographic databases and one trial registry were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials up to April 23, 2024. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. In clinically and methodologically comparable studies, random-effects meta-analysis were performed. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and certainty of evidence with the GRADE approach. Results: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria, eleven studies including 2,315 preterm born infants reported relevant outcomes, and seven contributed to meta-analyses. Most reported results showed some concerns or high risk of bias; certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate across outcomes. EI may offer small benefits for selective attention, behavioral problems and parent-child interaction. Little to no effect was found for special educational needs, language skills, executive functioning and the use of medical services. No included studies evaluated the effect of EI on ADHD, quality of life, or participation related to mobility or leisure activities. Interpretation: EI may improve problems typically seen in preterm children and should be offered especially to those with additional medical or social risk factors. High-quality, contemporary trials are needed to establish reliable clinical recommendations regarding EI strategies and complementary interventions throughout childhood.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.