Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Myopia prevalence among Malaysian children is estimated between 16% and 25% depending on diagnostic methodsAnalysis Shows Myopia Prevalence Among Children in Malaysia

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that non-cycloplegic methods may overstate myopia prevalence compared to cycloplegic assessments in children.

This meta-analysis synthesized data from 17 studies involving 19,281 Malaysian children aged 4–18 years to assess myopia prevalence. The study highlights significant variability in reported rates based on diagnostic techniques. Specifically, the unadjusted pooled prevalence was 25.0% (95% CI: 15.0–37.0%).

Analysis of measurement methods revealed that non-cycloplegic refraction estimates resulted in a higher prevalence of 31%, whereas cycloplegic refraction estimates yielded a lower prevalence of approximately 16%. A trim-and-fill adjusted prevalence was calculated at 15.8%. These discrepancies suggest that the choice of diagnostic method significantly impacts reported figures.

The authors noted several limitations, including high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.3%), non-standardized measurement methods, and varying diagnostic thresholds ranging from ≤ -0.25 D to ≤ -1.00 D. Because of these inconsistencies, the unadjusted estimate of 25.0% may overstate clinically confirmed cases.

For clinical practice, the results suggest that the clinically confirmed prevalence of myopia in Malaysian children likely lies between 16% and 25%. Clinicians should be aware that non-cycloplegic methods may lead to higher reported prevalence rates compared to cycloplegic assessments.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis provides specific regional data on myopia prevalence in Malaysia, extending the understanding of pediatric myopia beyond the general risk factors identified in Chinese school students. While previous evidence has focused on interventions like atropine, HAL lenses, and acupoint stimulation for myopia control, this study addresses a gap by quantifying the actual prevalence within a specific geographic population using various diagnostic methods.

Researchers analyzed data from over 19,000 children aged 4 to 18 years in Malaysia to determine how common nearsightedness, or myopia, is in this region. The study looked at various ways of measuring vision to find a clear picture of the problem.

The findings suggest that the actual number of confirmed cases of myopia likely falls between 16% and 25%. Some measurement methods showed higher rates of 31%, while others using specific eye drops for clarity showed lower rates of about 16%. Because different clinics used different rules to define what counts as nearsightedness, the numbers can vary significantly.

It is important to note that this was a large review of existing data rather than a new clinical trial. Because many studies used different methods, some results might be less precise. These findings help doctors understand how common myopia is in local children so they can better manage eye care.

What this means for you:
The study suggests the confirmed rate of myopia in Malaysian children is likely between 16% and 25%.

Common questions

How common is nearsightedness in Malaysian children?

The study suggests that the clinically confirmed prevalence of myopia in Malaysian children likely lies between 16% and 25%. This number is based on an analysis of 19,281 children aged 4 to 18 years across 17 different studies.

Why do the reported numbers for myopia vary so much?

The results vary because different measurement methods were used. For example, non-cycloplegic refraction showed a prevalence of 31%, while cycloplegic refraction showed approximately 16%. These differences occur because not all studies used the same standards to define myopia.

Is the 25% figure the most accurate estimate?

The unadjusted prevalence was 25.0%, but this may overstate clinical cases due to inconsistent measurement methods across different studies. Because of these inconsistencies, researchers suggest the confirmed rate is more likely between 16% and 25%.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Myopia is a growing global concern, projected to affect nearly half the world’s population by 2050. East and Southeast Asia face a disproportionate burden, with early-onset cases leading to severe complications in children. In Malaysia, epidemiological data on childhood myopia remain limited and inconsistent, hindering accurate burden estimation. To systematically review and synthesize the prevalence of myopia among Malaysian children aged 4–18 years, providing national and subgroup-specific estimates. A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted across five databases. Eligible studies included cross-sectional, cohort, or population-based designs published in English. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data. A random-effects meta-analysis using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation pooled prevalence rates from 17 studies. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored heterogeneity by age, ethnicity, region, cycloplegia status, and diagnostic method. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots, Egger’s, Begg’s, and trim-and-fill methods. Study quality was appraised using the JBI checklist. Of 1,147 records, 21 studies were included in the synthesis, with 17 suitable for meta-analysis (n = 19,281). The unadjusted pooled prevalence of myopia was 25.0% (95% CI: 15.0–37.0%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 99.3%). Subgroup analysis showed that studies using non-cycloplegic refraction yielded a higher prevalence estimate than studies using cycloplegic refraction (31% versus approximately 16%). The trim-and-fill adjusted prevalence was 15.8%, suggesting that the unadjusted pooled estimate may overestimate clinically confirmed myopia prevalence because of non-standardised measurement methods, variable diagnostic thresholds ranging from ≤ − 0.25 D to ≤ − 1.00 D, and possible small-study or publication effects. Higher prevalence was also observed in older studies, smaller samples, and subjective methods, and increased with age and among Chinese children. Eight studies were high quality, eight moderate, and one low. Childhood myopia represents an important public health concern in Malaysia. However, the magnitude of prevalence should be interpreted with caution because of high heterogeneity, variation in myopia definitions, and the predominance of non-cycloplegic measurement methods, all of which may cause the unadjusted estimate to overestimate clinically confirmed prevalence. Although the unadjusted pooled prevalence was 25.0%, the trim-and-fill adjusted estimate of 15.8% and the cycloplegic subgroup estimate of approximately 16% suggest that the clinically confirmed prevalence is likely to lie closer to the lower end of an approximate range of 16 to 25%. Future nationally representative studies using standardised cycloplegic refraction and consistent diagnostic criteria are needed to guide resource allocation, screening, and policy planning. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251012425, CRD420251012425.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.