Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Polymyxins in resistant Gram-negative infections: 22% all-cause mortality, 10% nephrotoxicityPolymyxins For Kids: 22% Mortality In Resistant Infections

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret polymyxin outcomes as descriptive; no comparator limits comparative conclusions.

This meta-analysis examined clinical outcomes and safety of intravenous polymyxin-containing therapy in hospitalized children with documented or suspected resistant Gram-negative infections. It pooled 1,152 reported patients or treatment units. No comparator was reported, and follow-up duration was not reported.

All-cause mortality was 22% (95% CI 16%-27%) and infection-related mortality was 14% (95% CI 11%-17%). Clinical improvement was reported in 65% (95% CI 58%-72%). Overall adverse events occurred in 13% (95% CI 9%-17%), with nephrotoxicity in 10% (95% CI 7%-14%). Neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity were listed as secondary outcomes, but rates were not reported.

The authors note substantial heterogeneity in clinical setting, dosing, outcome definitions, and units of analysis. They state that the evidence does not establish comparative efficacy or causality for adverse events. Serious adverse events, discontinuations, tolerability, funding, and conflicts of interest were not reported.

These findings describe event frequencies in a pediatric population receiving polymyxins, but the absence of a comparator and the heterogeneity across included data mean no conclusions can be drawn about how polymyxins compare with other regimens. Clinicians should interpret the mortality and nephrotoxicity estimates as descriptive rather than comparative.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis provides pooled event frequencies for polymyxin therapy in children with resistant Gram-negative infections, a population not addressed in prior coverage. Prior evidence noted that beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor therapy reduces all-cause mortality and nephrotoxicity in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections, and that CRE therapy evidence remains limited. The present analysis does not compare polymyxins against BL/BLI or other agents, so it does not confirm or contrast those comparative findings. It adds descriptive safety and outcome data for polymyxins, while reinforcing the need to select agents based on susceptibility and patient factors.

A new meta-analysis looked at hospitalized children with documented or suspected resistant Gram-negative infections. It pooled data from 1,152 reported patients or treatment units. All received intravenous polymyxin-containing therapy. The analysis did not compare polymyxins to another treatment.

The main findings were mixed. About 22 out of 100 children died from any cause (95% CI 16 to 27). About 14 out of 100 died from infection-related causes (95% CI 11 to 17). About 65 out of 100 showed clinical improvement (95% CI 58 to 72).

Side effects were reported. About 13 out of 100 had any adverse event (95% CI 9 to 17). Kidney toxicity occurred in about 10 out of 100 (95% CI 7 to 14). The analysis could not show that polymyxins caused these side effects.

The study has important limits. The children were very different from each other in setting, dosing, and how outcomes were defined. Because there was no comparison group, the results cannot show whether polymyxins work better or worse than other treatments. The findings describe what happened in these children, not what caused it. Parents should talk with their child's care team about the risks and benefits of any treatment.

What this means for you:
In kids with resistant infections, polymyxins showed 22% mortality and 65% improvement, but no comparison group.

Common questions

Who was included in this study?

The analysis included 1,152 reported patients or treatment units. They were hospitalized children with documented or suspected resistant Gram-negative infections. All received intravenous polymyxin-containing therapy. The study did not report a comparison group or follow-up time.

Can this study tell us if polymyxins are safe or effective?

No. This was a meta-analysis without a comparison group. It describes outcomes in children who received polymyxins but cannot prove that the drug caused the side effects or that it works better than other treatments. The children also differed in setting, dosing, and how outcomes were defined. Talk with your child's doctor about treatment options.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundIntravenous polymyxins remain salvage agents for resistant Gram-negative infections in children, but pediatric evidence on clinical outcomes and toxicity is fragmented.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Data, SinoMed, and VIP from inception to 31 January 2025. Eligible studies reported intravenous polymyxin-containing therapy in hospitalized pediatric patients with documented or suspected resistant Gram-negative infections. Random-effects single-arm meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled outcome proportions.ResultsTwenty-four studies comprising 1,152 reported patients or treatment units were included, most of which were single-arm observational studies. The pooled proportions were 22% [95% confidence interval (CI) 16%–27%] for all-cause mortality, 14% (95% CI 11%–17%) for infection-related mortality, 65% (95% CI 58%–72%) for clinical improvement, 13% (95% CI 9%–17%) for overall adverse events, and 10% (95% CI 7%–14%) for nephrotoxicity. Neurotoxicity and hepatotoxicity were infrequently reported. Clinical setting, dosing, outcome definitions, and units of analysis were heterogeneous.ConclusionsThe available evidence describes outcomes observed during intravenous polymyxin-containing therapy in hospitalized children but does not establish comparative efficacy or causality for adverse events. Prospective multicenter pediatric studies using standardized dosing, outcome, and safety definitions are needed.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.