Cognitive training add-on to behavioral weight-loss intervention shows moderate BMI reductions at 6 months
This randomized controlled trial enrolled 148 participants (mean BMI 31.62 kg/m², 85% women) with excess weight to evaluate a comprehensive cognitive training add-on to standard behavioral weight-loss intervention (BWLI). Participants were randomized to three groups: Cognitive (inhibitory control, approach-avoidance bias modification, implementation intentions, episodic future thinking plus BWLI), Sham (placebo cognitive interventions plus BWLI), or Control (BWLI only). The intervention was delivered via online group sessions, with 128 participants (86.5%) completing the study.
At post-treatment, 3-month, and 6-month follow-ups, the Cognitive group showed significantly greater reductions than the Control group across all measured outcomes. Group-by-time interactions were significant for BMI (p=0.009), weight (p=0.003), percentage of weight loss (p=0.004), and waist-to-height ratio (p=0.041). Effect sizes were described as moderate for the Cognitive group at 6 months, with a higher proportion achieving clinically meaningful weight loss compared to Control, though specific thresholds and absolute weight change numbers were not reported.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study had a 13.5% discontinuation rate. Key limitations include the lack of reported absolute weight/BMI change values, reliance on descriptive effect size labels without numerical values, and unclear definition of 'clinically meaningful' weight loss. Funding and conflicts of interest were not disclosed.
While the RCT design supports causal inference, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously. The results suggest cognitive training components may provide additional benefit when combined with standard behavioral approaches for weight management, with effects sustained over 6 months. However, the practical relevance remains uncertain without knowing the magnitude of absolute weight changes achieved.