Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Protocol outlines target trial emulation for bipolar disorder treatments in patients with opioid use disorderStudy protocol compares bipolar disorder medications for people with opioid use disorder

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note: This is only a study protocol with no results available.

This is a protocol for a target trial emulation study using population-level health administrative data from British Columbia and Ontario, Canada. The study population includes all individuals aged 18 years or older diagnosed with both bipolar disorder and opioid use disorder who initiated treatments for bipolar disorder between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2023. The protocol outlines planned comparisons between pharmacological treatment options including lithium, non-antipsychotic mood stabilizers (divalproex, lamotrigine, valproic acid), 2nd generation antipsychotics with mood stabilizing properties (risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, quetiapine), and various combination treatments. Specific comparisons include lithium versus non-antipsychotic mood stabilizers, lithium versus 2nd generation antipsychotics, lithium versus combination treatments, and lithium and valproate versus other combination treatments.

No results are available as this is only a study protocol. The planned secondary outcomes include psychiatric acute-care visits (hospitalizations and emergency department visits), bipolar disorder treatment discontinuation, and all-cause mortality. The primary outcome is not reported in the protocol.

Safety and tolerability data are not reported. Adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuation rates are not reported in this protocol. The study limitations are not reported in the protocol document.

This protocol describes planned analyses only and contains no actual findings. The target trial emulation approach uses observational data to emulate randomized controlled trials, but results will be subject to the limitations of administrative data. Clinicians should await actual study results before drawing any conclusions about treatment effectiveness in this complex patient population with dual diagnoses.

Researchers have created a detailed plan to study how well different medications work for people who have both bipolar disorder and opioid use disorder. The study will look at health records from adults in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada, who started treatment for bipolar disorder between 2010 and 2023. They plan to compare several common treatments, including lithium, other mood stabilizers, certain antipsychotics, and combinations of these medications.

The study will measure important outcomes like psychiatric hospital visits, whether people stop their treatment, and death from any cause. This type of research, called a target trial emulation, uses existing health data to try to answer questions that would normally require a randomized controlled trial. It's an observational study, which means researchers will look back at what treatments people already received rather than assigning treatments.

It's important to understand that this is only a study protocol—a plan for how the research will be done. No results or findings are available yet. The eventual findings will come from analyzing administrative health records, which have limitations compared to clinical trials specifically designed to test medications. This research could eventually help inform treatment decisions, but for now, it's simply a well-designed plan for future analysis.

What this means for you:
This is a study plan, not results. It will compare bipolar medications in people with opioid use disorder using health records.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Introduction People with bipolar disorder (BD) and concurrent opioid use disorder (OUD) experience more severe clinical outcomes, including higher mortality, treatment complexity, and worse psychiatric symptoms, yet they are underserved due to a lack of tailored clinical guidelines and limited supporting research on competing treatment options. While pharmacological treatments for BD are well-established, their use varies widely across settings, and their effectiveness in individuals with co-occurring OUD is unclear. We propose parallel population-based studies to emulate randomized controlled trials to assess the comparative effectiveness of pharmacological treatment options for BD among people with OUD in British Columbia and Ontario, Canada, 2010-2023. Methods and analysis We propose emulating a series of parallel target trials using linked population-level health administrative data for all individuals aged 18 years or older diagnosed with both BD and OUD and who initiated treatments for BD between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2023. All analyses will be conducted in parallel in British Columbia and Ontario. We propose a series of four successive target trial emulations, comparing (i) lithium versus non-antipsychotic mood stabilizers such as divalproex, lamotrigine, and valproic acid; (ii) lithium versus 2nd generation antipsychotics with mood stabilizing properties such as risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and quetiapine; (iii) lithium versus combination treatments such as lithium and divalproex, lithium and olanzapine, lithium and aripiprazole, lithium and quetiapine, divalproex and olanzapine, and olanzapine and quetiapine; (iv) lithium and valproate (LATVAL) versus lithium and olanzapine, lithium and aripiprazole, lithium and quetiapine, divalproex and olanzapine, and olanzapine and quetiapine. Incident user and prevalent new user analyses are planned for proposed target trials (i)-(iv), pending sufficient data. Stratified analyses will be conducted for BD-I, manic and depressive phases of BD illness. We propose an initiator analysis (intention-to-treat, conditional on medication dispensation) to determine the effectiveness of the treatments and per-protocol analyses to determine the efficacy of the treatments after dealing with treatment switching and recommended dose adjustment. The outcomes will include psychiatric acute-care visits (hospitalizations and emergency department visits), BD treatment discontinuation and all-cause mortality. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses, including cohort and study timeline restrictions, eligibility criteria modifications, and outcome reclassifications, are proposed to assess the robustness of our results. Executing analyses in parallel across settings using a co-developed protocol will allow us to evaluate the replicability of findings. Ethics and dissemination The protocol, cohort creation, and analysis plan have been classified and approved as a quality improvement initiative by the Providence Health Care Research Ethics Board and the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. Results will be disseminated to local advocacy groups, clinical groups and decision-makers, national and international clinical guideline developers, presented at international conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.