Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Speech latency ratios as a vocal biomarker identify patients with improved treatment outcomes in schizophreniaVocal biomarker may boost schizophrenia trial results

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that speech latency ratios may serve as an enrichment tool to identify patients with better responses to treatment.

This multicenter Phase 3 randomized controlled trial enrolled 406 participants with acute psychosis from three countries and eight languages. The study evaluated brilaroxazine (RP5063) combined with enrichment using speech latency ratios as a vocal biomarker compared to a placebo over a 28-day period.

The primary outcome was not reported; however, secondary outcomes provided significant data on the vocal biomarker's performance. Speech latency ratio showed excellent internal consistency and good temporal stability. In patients with moderate-to-severe negative symptoms, large effect sizes were observed for longer speech latencies compared to those without. The VBM classification achieved an AUC of 0.71, identifying 180 VBM neg and 228 VBM pos participants.

Treatment outcomes in the VBM-pos group versus placebo showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to end of treatment for nearly every outcome measure. No specific data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, or tolerability were reported. While speech latency ratios may serve as a useful enrichment tool to reduce sample size needs and enhance trial outcomes, the lack of safety data and specific primary results limits immediate clinical application.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in identifying specific patient subgroups for targeted intervention in schizophrenia. While previous coverage noted that 11 risk factors can identify high-risk patients for tailored interventions, this trial explores using speech latency as a biomarker to enrich treatment outcomes. It complements existing research on biomarkers like elevated GFAP levels and N170 ERP components by providing a vocal biomarker approach to patient stratification.

A new study tested whether a simple voice recording could help predict who will benefit from a schizophrenia treatment. Researchers used a vocal biomarker that measures speech latency, or the pause before answering. They enrolled 406 people with acute psychosis from three countries speaking eight languages. All participants took the experimental drug brilaroxazine or a placebo for 28 days.

The biomarker showed excellent internal consistency and good stability over time. Patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms had longer speech latencies. The test classified participants into two groups: 180 with negative vocal biomarker and 228 with positive. In the positive group, the drug showed large, statistically significant improvements on nearly every outcome measure compared to placebo.

This is a phase 3 randomized controlled trial, but the primary outcome was not reported, and limitations were not disclosed. The study suggests that using speech latency as an enrichment tool could reduce sample size needs and enhance outcomes in clinical trials. However, the claim that it nearly doubled the drug-placebo effect is based on previous evidence, not necessarily this trial's primary analysis.

For now, this is early evidence that voice analysis might help personalize schizophrenia treatment. More research is needed before this becomes a standard tool. Patients should discuss any new treatments with their doctor.

What this means for you:
Voice analysis may help identify schizophrenia patients who respond better to treatment, but more research is needed.

Common questions

What is a vocal biomarker?

A vocal biomarker is a voice-based measurement, like speech latency (the pause before answering), that can indicate certain health conditions. In this study, it helped identify patients with schizophrenia who might respond better to treatment.

How was the vocal biomarker tested?

Researchers used speech latency ratios from voice recordings of 406 participants with acute psychosis. They found the biomarker had excellent internal consistency and good stability over time, and it classified patients into groups with positive or negative biomarker status.

Did the drug work better in patients with a positive vocal biomarker?

Yes, in the group with a positive vocal biomarker, the drug brilaroxazine showed large, statistically significant improvements on nearly every outcome measure compared to placebo.

Is this test ready for use in clinics?

Not yet. This is early research from a clinical trial. More studies are needed to confirm the findings and determine if the test can be used in everyday practice. Talk to your doctor about current treatment options.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 406
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Speech latency, an objective measure of verbal response time, is sensitive to cognitive, social, and motivational factors and can be measured using recordings of psychiatric interviews. Emerging evidence suggests that it can be used to enrich participants in antidepressant clinical trials, resulting in nearly double the drug-placebo effect at half the sample size. Here, we evaluated whether enrichment of participants using speech latency ratios, a variant of speech latency accounting for duration of response, improved outcomes in a clinical trial of schizophrenia. METHODS: Audio recordings from psychiatric interviews in a phase 3, 28-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, multicenter, parallel-group monotherapy study of brilaroxazine (RP5063) were examined. There were 2320 recordings for 406 participants with acute psychosis from 3 countries representing 8 languages. RESULTS: Speech latency ratios showed excellent internal consistency, good temporal stability, and minimal convergence with potential confounders. Patients with (vs. without) moderate-to-severe negative symptoms showed longer speech latencies, with large effect sizes observed in nearly every country and language. A single speech latency ratio value (area under the curve = 0.71) identified 180 and 228 participants as being vocal biomarker negative (VBM neg; unremarkable speech) and VBM positive (VBM pos; relatively high ratios), respectively. Brilaroxazine showed statistically significant outcomes versus placebo from baseline to end of treatment in the VBM-pos group for nearly every outcome measure despite having fewer participants. Treatment effects for VBM-pos patients were large for nearly every outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Speech latency ratios are a face-valid, objective biomarker derived from standard clinical assessments. As an enrichment tool, it reduced sample size needs and enhanced outcomes. This has important implications for reducing clinical trial costs and burden.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.